Literature DB >> 15106027

Women's experiences with low-risk singleton in-hospital delivery in Switzerland.

D L B Schwappach1, A Blaudszun, D Conen, K Eichler, M-A Hochreutener, C M Koeck.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess maternal and neonatal clinical short-term outcomes and women's experiences with singleton low-risk in-hospital deliveries in a routine care setting.
METHODS: In 13 community hospitals in the Cantons of Zurich (10), St. Gallen (2) and Schwyz (1), participating in the "Canton of Zurich Outcomes Project", trained hospital staff recorded clinical outcome data. Patients completed a questionnaire at the end of the hospital stay. Over two measurement cycles, 3395 eligible women entered the study and 2079 (61%) returned the questionnaire.
RESULTS: Sixty-seven percent of women had spontaneous and 11% had assisted vaginal deliveries, 12% delivered by emergency, and 10% by elective Caesarean section. The episiotomy rate in vaginal deliveries was 46% (95% CI 44-48%). Ten percent of neonates had umbilical cord artery pH < or =7.15 (95% CI 9-11%) and Apgar scores at five minutes were < or = 7 in 3% (95% CI 2.5-3.6%). Reporting negative experiences with hospital care and an insufficient state of knowledge at discharge were strongly associated with mode of delivery. The top three issues new mothers were most likely to report about feeling little or not informed about were postpartum pelvic floor exercises (22%), management of vaginal bleedings (12%), and alternatives of infant feeding (10%).
CONCLUSION: In a setting of routine care poor short-term outcomes were rare in women giving birth in hospitals, and neonates and most mothers were discharged with a level of information that at least ensured a smooth transition to follow-up maternal care. Poor clinical results and patient-reported negative experiences concentrate in few individuals. Restrictive approaches that reduce the frequency of instrumental vaginal delivery, and routine episiotomy remain an important objective for quality improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15106027     DOI: 2004/07/smw-10483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly        ISSN: 0036-7672            Impact factor:   2.193


  4 in total

1.  Delivery route preferences of urban women of low socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Bela Kudish; Shobha Mehta; Michael Kruger; Evie Russell; Robert J Sokol
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 3.561

Review 2.  The EpiNo® Device: Efficacy, Tolerability, and Impact on Pelvic Floor-Implications for Future Research.

Authors:  Tilemachos Kavvadias; Irene Hoesli
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2016-02-14

3.  "Against the silence": development and first results of a patient survey to assess experiences of safety-related events in hospital.

Authors:  David L B Schwappach
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Women's, partners' and healthcare providers' views and experiences of assisted vaginal birth: a systematic mixed methods review.

Authors:  Nicola Crossland; Carol Kingdon; Marie-Clare Balaam; Ana Pilar Betrán; Soo Downe
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.223

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.