Literature DB >> 15105390

Day 2 elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice: better outcome in ICSI cycles.

Hannu Martikainen1, Mauri Orava, Jouni Lakkakorpi, Leena Tuomivaara.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single embryo transfer (SET) after IVF/ICSI has been shown to result in an acceptable pregnancy rate in selected subjects. In our unit, SET is routinely carried out among women under the age of 36 in the first or second treatment cycle when a top-quality embryo is available. In order to define further the selection criteria for SET, we have analysed the outcome of elective SET (eSET), including the cumulative pregnancy rate after frozen embryo transfers, performed in the years 2000-2002 in the Oulu Fertility Center.
METHODS: During the study period, a total of 1271 transfers were performed, and in 468 cycles SET (39% of all transfers) was carried out. Of the SET cycles, in 308 cases a top-quality embryo was transferred on day 2 and extra embryos were frozen. Of these eSET cycles, ICSI was carried out in 87 cycles (28%).
RESULTS: The overall clinical pregnancy rate per transfer was 34.7% in the eSET cycles. In the eSET ICSI cycles, the clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher than in the corresponding IVF cycles (50.6 versus 28.5%, P < 0.001). The cumulative pregnancy rate per patient after fresh and frozen embryo transfers was also significantly higher after ICSI (71.2 versus 53.4%, P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: A high cumulative pregnancy rate per oocyte retrieval can be achieved after eSET in daily clinical practice. The implantation rate of fresh top-quality embryos in the ICSI cycles was significantly higher than in the IVF cycles, possibly due to more successful selection of the embryo for embryo transfer on day 2 after ICSI. In addition, our data suggest that embryo quality is a more important determinant of outcome than the age of the woman.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15105390     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  5 in total

1.  Better intracytoplasmic sperm injection without sperm membranes and acrosome.

Authors:  Eduardo R S Roldan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Pregnancy outcome and live birth after IVF and ICSI according to embryo quality.

Authors:  Patricia Fauque; Roger Léandri; Françoise Merlet; Jean-Claude Juillard; Sylvie Epelboin; Juliette Guibert; Pierre Jouannet; Catherine Patrat
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-03-06       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Pregnancy prediction models and eSET criteria for IVF patients--do we need more information?

Authors:  Lars D M Ottosen; Ulrik Kesmodel; Johnny Hindkjaer; Hans Jakob Ingerslev
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Comparisons of benefits and risks of single embryo transfer versus double embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shujuan Ma; Yangqin Peng; Liang Hu; Xiaojuan Wang; Yiquan Xiong; Yi Tang; Jing Tan; Fei Gong
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 5.211

5.  Which is better for mothers and babies: fresh or frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer?

Authors:  Meiling Yang; Li Lin; Chunli Sha; Taoqiong Li; Wujiang Gao; Lu Chen; Ying Wu; Yanping Ma; Xiaolan Zhu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.007

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.