Literature DB >> 15105178

Residential and occupational exposures to 50-Hz magnetic fields and breast cancer in women: a population-based study.

Jolanta Kliukiene1, Tore Tynes, Aage Andersen.   

Abstract

A case-control study was conducted to investigate whether residential and occupational exposures to magnetic fields increased the risk for breast cancer among women. Cases of breast cancer diagnosed during 1980-1996 were identified in a cohort of women living near a high-voltage power line in Norway in 1980 or between 1986 and 1996. Each case was matched by year of birth, municipality, and first year of entry into the cohort with two randomly selected controls without cancer. Residential exposure to magnetic fields was calculated as that generated by the lines before diagnosis, and occupational exposure was based on exposure matrix data. Women with residential exposure had an odds ratio of 1.58 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.30, 1.92) when compared with unexposed women. The odds ratios for exposed women versus unexposed women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative breast cancer were 1.33 (95% CI: 0.93, 1.90) and 1.40 (95% CI: 0.78, 2.50), respectively (ER status was available for 44% of the cases). Women with the highest occupational exposure had an odds ratio of 1.13 (95% CI: 0.91, 1.40) when compared with those unexposed at work. The findings suggest an association between exposure to magnetic fields and breast cancer in women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15105178     DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwh116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  8 in total

1.  Occupation and breast cancer risk among Shanghai women in a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Bu-Tian Ji; Aaron Blair; Xiao-Ou Shu; Wong-Ho Chow; Michael Hauptmann; Mustafa Dosemeci; Gong Yang; Jay Lubin; Yu-Tang Gao; Nathaniel Rothman; Wei Zheng
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 2.  State of the evidence 2017: an update on the connection between breast cancer and the environment.

Authors:  Janet M Gray; Sharima Rasanayagam; Connie Engel; Jeanne Rizzo
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 5.984

3.  High prevalence of gastroschisis in Brazilian triple side border: A socioenvironmental spatial analysis.

Authors:  Suzana de Souza; Oscar Kenji Nihei; Cezar Rangel Pestana
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Retinoic acid inhibits the cytoproliferative response to weak 50‑Hz magnetic fields in neuroblastoma cells.

Authors:  María Ángeles Trillo; María Antonia Martínez; María Antonia Cid; Alejandro Úbeda
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 5.  Emerging technologies for salivaomics in cancer detection.

Authors:  Karolina Elżbieta Kaczor-Urbanowicz; Carmen Martín Carreras-Presas; Tadeusz Kaczor; Michael Tu; Fang Wei; Franklin Garcia-Godoy; David T W Wong
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2016-11-13       Impact factor: 5.310

6.  Long-term exposure to electromagnetic radiation from mobile phones and Wi-Fi devices decreases plasma prolactin, progesterone, and estrogen levels but increases uterine oxidative stress in pregnant rats and their offspring.

Authors:  Murat Yüksel; Mustafa Nazıroğlu; Mehmet Okan Özkaya
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.633

7.  A meta-analysis on the relationship between exposure to ELF-EMFs and the risk of female breast cancer.

Authors:  Qingsong Chen; Li Lang; Wenzhe Wu; Guoyong Xu; Xiao Zhang; Tao Li; Hanlin Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Occupational exposure to magnetic fields and breast cancer among Canadian men.

Authors:  Anne Grundy; Shelley A Harris; Paul A Demers; Kenneth C Johnson; David A Agnew; Paul J Villeneuve
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.452

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.