Literature DB >> 15105029

Comparison of two nutrition assessment techniques in hospitalized patients.

Hülya Sungurtekin1, Uğur Sungurtekin, Volkan Hanci, Ergün Erdem.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Different methods have been used to assess nutritional status in hospitalized patients, and there is no agreement as to which index best reflects nutritional status. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of malnutrition and compare the Subjective Global Assessment, Nutrition Risk Index, and non-nutritional factors in hospitalized patients.
METHODS: This prospective study was done in the teaching hospital of Pamukkale University Medical School, Denizli, Turkey. Two hundred fifty-one consecutive patients hospitalized in medical and surgical wards were studied. On admission, the Subjective Global Assessment, Nutrition Risk Index, anthropometric measurements, and laboratory data were assessed. Differences between independent groups were assessed with Student's t test and one-way analysis of variance. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were calculated for associations between scores and variables. Agreement between two assessment methods was analyzed by the K statistic.
RESULTS: On admission, 30% of patients were malnourished according to the Subjective Global Assessment and 36% according to the Nutrition Risk Index. Body weight, albumin, lymphocyte, total cholesterol, and anthropometric data were lower in the malnourished patients according to both assessments (P < 0.01). Body weight loss and length of stay were higher in the malnourished patients according to both assessments (P < 0.01). Body weight, anthropometric data, albumin, and total cholesterol correlated inversely with nutritional status according to both techniques. Concordance was observed in 203 of the 251 (81%) patients with both assessments (K = 0.57, P = 0.000).
CONCLUSIONS: Both tests correlated with each other with respect to age, length of stay, and anthropometric and laboratory data in hospitalized patients. Therefore, these two techniques can be used for nutritional assessment in hospitalized patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15105029     DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2004.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutrition        ISSN: 0899-9007            Impact factor:   4.008


  8 in total

1.  Low lymphocyte count in underweight Japanese women.

Authors:  Tomoko Nishida; Hisataka Sakakibara
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 3.674

2.  Comparison of two nutritional assessment methods in gastroenterology patients.

Authors:  Branka F Filipović; Milan Gajić; Nikola Milinić; Branislav Milovanović; Branislav R Filipović; Mirjana Cvetković; Nela Sibalić
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Nutritional screening tools in daily clinical practice: the focus on cancer.

Authors:  Michèle Leuenberger; Silvia Kurmann; Zeno Stanga
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Prognostic value of nutritional screening tools for patients scheduled for cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Vladimir V Lomivorotov; Sergey M Efremov; Vladimir A Boboshko; Dmitry A Nikolaev; Pavel E Vedernikov; Mihail N Deryagin; Vladimir N Lomivorotov; Alexander M Karaskov
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-01-29

5.  Capturing the data: nutrition risk screening of adults in hospital.

Authors:  Elizabeth Frew; Robyn Cant; Jennifer Sequeira
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Evaluation of body composition monitoring for assessment of nutritional status in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Haifen Zhang; Xingjuan Tao; Ling Shi; Na Jiang; Yan Yang
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.606

7.  Association between indication for therapy by nutrition support team and nutritional status.

Authors:  Byung Chul Shin; In Ae Chun; So Yeon Ryu; Ji Eun Oh; Pahn Kyu Choi; Hyun Goo Kang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Comparison of preoperative Nutritional Risk Index and Body Mass Index for predicting immediate postoperative outcomes following major gastrointestinal surgery: Cohort-study.

Authors:  Nabin Pokharel; Gaurav Katwal; Subodh Kumar Adhikari
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2019-10-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.