Literature DB >> 15104829

Bladder injury after LAVH: a prospective, randomized comparison of vaginal and laparoscopic approaches to colpotomy during LAVH.

Shang-Gwo Horng1, Kuan-Gen Huang, Tsia-Shu Lo, Yoong-Kuei Soong.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To compare results of a vaginal approach to colpotomy (type IA) and laparoscopic-assisted abdominal colpotomy (type ID) in performing a laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH).
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study (Canadian Task Force classification I).
SETTING: Tertiary teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Five hundred forty-one women, 274 in group 1 (type 1D) and 267 in group 2 (type 1A). INTERVENTION: LAVH with follow-up for 3 months to 5 years.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in age, preoperative and postoperative hemoglobin values, or postoperative hospital stay between groups. Operating time and estimated blood loss were significantly reduced in group 2 (p <0.001 and <0.001, respectively). Women in group 1 had nine urinary tract injuries (3.28%), including eight cases of intraoperative bladder injury (2.91%) and one vesicovaginal fistula (0.36%), but no ureteral injury. The bladder injury rate in group 2 was 0.37%, which was significantly lower (p = 0.038). There were no significant differences in ureteral or bowel injuries, pelvic hematomas, or pelvic abscesses.
CONCLUSION: LAVH type IA achieved better results than type ID in preventing bladder injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15104829     DOI: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60008-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc        ISSN: 1074-3804


  7 in total

1.  NOTES, MANOS, SILS and other new laparoendoscopic techniques.

Authors:  José F Noguera; Angel Cuadrado
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-06-16

2.  Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) (NCT00835250).

Authors:  José F Noguera; Angel Cuadrado; Carlos Dolz; José M Olea; Juan C García
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Transvaginal specimen extraction versus conventional minilaparotomy after laparoscopic anterior resection for colorectal cancer: mid-term results of a case-matched study.

Authors:  Hye Jin Kim; Gyu-Seog Choi; Jun Seok Park; Soo Yeun Park; Jong Pil Ryuk; Sung Hwan Yoon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  A novel approach of robotic-assisted anterior resection with transanal or transvaginal retrieval of the specimen for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Gyu-Seog Choi; In Ja Park; Byung Mo Kang; Kyoung Hoon Lim; Soo-Han Jun
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Minimizing bladder injury in laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy among women with previous cesarean sections.

Authors:  W-C Chang; W-C Hsu; B-C Sheu; S-C Huang; P-L Torng; D-Y Chang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Feasibility and Technique for Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery Liver Resection: A Porcine Model.

Authors:  Toshio Katagiri; Yuichiro Otsuka; Santiago Horgan; Bryan J Sandler; Garth R Jacobsen; Alisa M Coker; Masaru Tsuchiya; Tetsuya Maeda; Hironori Kaneko
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.719

Review 7.  Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.

Authors:  Johanna W M Aarts; Theodoor E Nieboer; Neil Johnson; Emma Tavender; Ray Garry; Ben Willem J Mol; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.