Literature DB >> 15104629

Biological osteosynthesis versus traditional anatomic reconstruction of 20 long-bone fractures using an interlocking nail: 1994-2001.

Christopher L Horstman1, Brian S Beale, Michael G Conzemius, Rich Evans R.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To observe differences in surgical and healing times as well as complication rates in dogs with a comminuted long-bone fracture stabilized with an interlocking nail (IN) using either anatomic or biologic repair. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective study. ANIMALS: Twenty client-owned dogs with comminuted long-bone fractures.
METHODS: Medical records for dogs with fractures repaired during a 7-year period were reviewed; 20 dogs had repair with an IN nail and radiographic evidence of healing. These 20 dogs where divided into 2 groups, anatomic (11 dogs) and biological (9) repair, for statistical evaluation. Surgical and healing time and complication rates were compared between groups.
RESULTS: Median surgical times were: anatomic (95 minutes) and biologic (110 minutes; P=.06). Median healing times were anatomic (8 weeks) and biologic (6 weeks; P=.04). No statistical differences were observed in complication rates (the likelihood that a case required a second surgery [P=.58], the likelihood of a complication that was managed non-surgically [P=.27]). Use of a bone graft did not shorten healing times (P=.55).
CONCLUSIONS: Biological osteosynthesis provides clinical advantages over anatomic reconstruction with respect to a reduction in surgical and healing time without increasing complication rates. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Highly comminuted long-bone fractures can be successfully repaired using an IN without reconstructing the fracture fragments in dogs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15104629     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2004.04034.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Surg        ISSN: 0161-3499            Impact factor:   1.495


  1 in total

1.  Comparison of post-operative outcomes after open or closed surgical techniques to stabilize metacarpal and metatarsal fractures in dogs and cats.

Authors:  Gabriel Carbonell Rosselló; Jasmin Carmel; Matthew Pead; Victor Vidal Lacosta; Pilar Lafuente
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 2.792

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.