Literature DB >> 15103686

Clinical evaluation of cobas core anti-dsDNA EIA quant.

Concepción González1, Paloma Guevara, Belén García-Berrocal, José Alejandro Navajo, José Manuel González-Buitrago.   

Abstract

The measurement of antibodies to double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) is a useful tool for the diagnosis and monitoring of patients with connective tissue diseases, particularly systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The aim of the present study was to compare a new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the measurement of anti-dsDNA antibodies, which uses purified double-stranded plasmid DNA as the antigen (anti-dsDNA EIA Quant; Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), with an established ELISA. The clinical usefulness of this new ELISA was also assessed. We measured anti-dsDNA antibodies in 398 serum samples that were divided into four groups: 1). routine samples sent to our laboratory for an antinuclear antibody (ANA) test (n=229), 2). samples from blood donors (n=74), 3). samples from patients with SLE (n=48), and 4) samples from patients with other autoimmune diseases (n=47). The methods used were the Cobas Core Anti-dsDNA EIA Quant (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) and the Anti-dsDNA test (Gull Diagnostics, Bois d'Arcy, France). We obtained a kappa index and Spearman correlation coefficient in the comparative study, and sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios in the clinical study. The results obtained show a good agreement between the two methods in both the qualitative results (kappa=0.91) and the quantitative data (r=0.854). The best accuracy, predictive values, likelihood ratios, and correlation with active disease were obtained with the Roche anti-dsDNA assay. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15103686      PMCID: PMC6808173          DOI: 10.1002/jcla.20023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal        ISSN: 0887-8013            Impact factor:   2.352


  17 in total

1.  A critical evaluation of enzyme immunoassays for detection of antinuclear autoantibodies of defined specificities. I. Precision, sensitivity, and specificity.

Authors:  E M Tan; J S Smolen; J S McDougal; B T Butcher; D Conn; R Dawkins; M J Fritzler; T Gordon; J A Hardin; J R Kalden; R G Lahita; R N Maini; N F Rothfield; R Smeenk; Y Takasaki; W J van Venrooij; A Wiik; M Wilson; J A Koziol
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1999-03

Review 2.  The use of laboratory tests in the diagnosis of SLE.

Authors:  W Egner
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Guidelines for the laboratory use of autoantibody tests in the diagnosis and monitoring of autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Renato Tozzoli; Nicola Bizzaro; Elio Tonutti; Danilo Villalta; Danila Bassetti; Fabio Manoni; Anna Piazza; Marco Pradella; Paolo Rizzotti
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  The utility of immunologic laboratory tests in patients with rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  A Kavanaugh
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2001-10

5.  Derivation of the SLEDAI. A disease activity index for lupus patients. The Committee on Prognosis Studies in SLE.

Authors:  C Bombardier; D D Gladman; M B Urowitz; D Caron; C H Chang
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1992-06

6.  The comparative study of anti-double stranded DNA antibody levels measured by radioimmunoassay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Y Takeuchi; O Ishikawa; Y Miyachi
Journal:  J Dermatol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.005

Review 7.  Anti-dsDNA: choice of assay in relation to clinical value.

Authors:  R J Smeenk; H G van den Brink; K Brinkman; R M Termaat; J H Berden; A J Swaak
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.631

8.  Measurement of anti-DNA antibodies: a reappraisal using five different methods.

Authors:  D A Isenberg; C Dudeney; W Williams; I Addison; S Charles; J Clarke; A Todd-Pokropek
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 9.  Serological markers of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  P E Spronk; P C Limburg; C G Kallenberg
Journal:  Lupus       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.911

10.  Prevention of relapses in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  H Bootsma; P Spronk; R Derksen; G de Boer; H Wolters-Dicke; J Hermans; P Limburg; F Gmelig-Meyling; L Kater; C Kallenberg
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-06-24       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.