Mikkel Østergaard1, Charlotte Wiell. 1. Department of Rheumatology, Copenhagen University Hospital at Hvidovre, Kettegaard alle 30, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark. mo@dadlnet.dk
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Through recent technological advances, ultrasonography allows high-resolution visualization of inflammatory and destructive changes in the small superficial joints of hands and feet, and ultrasonography is increasingly used by rheumatologists for assessment of rheumatoid arthritis patients. It is, therefore, highly relevant to consider the validity of ultrasonographic measures of rheumatoid joint inflammation and damage. RECENT FINDINGS: Organized by type of validity, data on ultrasonography in rheumatoid arthritis are reviewed. Encouraging reports of high agreement of ultrasonographic findings between observers, with MRI and, in knee and hip joints, histopathologic assessments were recently published. New quantitative and semiquantitative evaluation methods have been suggested, and the first systematic follow-up studies suggest an ability of ultrasonography to monitor joint inflammation and damage. However, a number of essential issues are still largely unexplored, including interscanner variability, sensitivity to change, prognostic value, and value in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Suggested areas of priority in research and development of ultrasonography in rheumatoid arthritis are outlined. SUMMARY: Ultrasonography is a very promising method in the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis joints, but still needs more validation before it can take up its expected role on a scientific basis as an important tool for diagnosis, monitoring, and prognostication of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and suspected rheumatoid arthritis.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Through recent technological advances, ultrasonography allows high-resolution visualization of inflammatory and destructive changes in the small superficial joints of hands and feet, and ultrasonography is increasingly used by rheumatologists for assessment of rheumatoid arthritispatients. It is, therefore, highly relevant to consider the validity of ultrasonographic measures of rheumatoid joint inflammation and damage. RECENT FINDINGS: Organized by type of validity, data on ultrasonography in rheumatoid arthritis are reviewed. Encouraging reports of high agreement of ultrasonographic findings between observers, with MRI and, in knee and hip joints, histopathologic assessments were recently published. New quantitative and semiquantitative evaluation methods have been suggested, and the first systematic follow-up studies suggest an ability of ultrasonography to monitor joint inflammation and damage. However, a number of essential issues are still largely unexplored, including interscanner variability, sensitivity to change, prognostic value, and value in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Suggested areas of priority in research and development of ultrasonography in rheumatoid arthritis are outlined. SUMMARY: Ultrasonography is a very promising method in the assessment of rheumatoid arthritis joints, but still needs more validation before it can take up its expected role on a scientific basis as an important tool for diagnosis, monitoring, and prognostication of patients with rheumatoid arthritis and suspected rheumatoid arthritis.
Authors: A K Scheel; W A Schmidt; K-G A Hermann; G A Bruyn; M A D'Agostino; W Grassi; A Iagnocco; J M Koski; K P Machold; E Naredo; H Sattler; N Swen; M Szkudlarek; R J Wakefield; H R Ziswiler; D Pasewaldt; C Werner; M Backhaus Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2005-01-07 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Stephen A Wright; Emilio Filippucci; Claire McVeigh; Arthur Grey; Maura McCarron; Walter Grassi; Gary D Wright; Allister J Taggart Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2006-12-21 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: A K Scheel; K-G A Hermann; S Ohrndorf; C Werner; C Schirmer; J Detert; M Bollow; B Hamm; G A Müller; G R Burmester; M Backhaus Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2005-09-28 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Marcin Szkudlarek; Mette Klarlund; Eva Narvestad; Michel Court-Payen; Charlotte Strandberg; Karl E Jensen; Henrik S Thomsen; Mikkel Østergaard Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2006-03-06 Impact factor: 5.156