Literature DB >> 15102724

Perinatal transport: problems in neonatal intensive care capacity.

A B Gill1, L Bottomley, S Chatfield, C Wood.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the quantity and nature of transfers within the Yorkshire perinatal service, with the aim of identifying suitable outcome measures for the assessment of future service improvements. DESIGN/
SETTING: Collection of data on perinatal transfers from all neonatal and maternity units located in the Yorkshire region of the United Kingdom from May to November 2000. PATIENTS: Expectant mothers (in utero transfers) and neonates (ex utero transfers).
INTERVENTIONS: None MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quantification of in utero and ex utero transfers; the reasons for and resources required to support transfers; the nature of each transfer (acute, specialist, non-acute, into or out of region).
RESULTS: In the period studied, there were 800 transfers (337 in utero; 463 ex utero); 306 transfers were "acute" (80% of transfers in utero), 214 because of specialist need, and 280 "non-acute". Some 37% of capacity transfers occurred from the two level 3 units in the region. Of 254 transfers out of the 14 neonatal units for intensive care, 44 (17.3%) were transferred to hospitals outside the normal neonatal commissioning boundaries.
CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights a continuing apparent lack of capacity within the neonatal service in the Yorkshire region, resulting in considerable numbers of neonatal and maternal transfers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15102724      PMCID: PMC1721688          DOI: 10.1136/adc.2003.028159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed        ISSN: 1359-2998            Impact factor:   5.747


  4 in total

1.  National census of availability of neonatal intensive care. British Association for Perinatal Medicine.

Authors:  J Parmanum; D Field; J Rennie; P Steer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-09-23

2.  The demand for neonatal intensive care.

Authors:  D J Field; S Hodges; E Mason; P Burton; J Yates; S Wale
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-11-25

3.  Neonatal intensive care cots: estimating the population based requirement in Trent, UK.

Authors:  P R Burton; E Draper; A Fenton; D Field
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Estimating the cots required for neonatal intensive care.

Authors:  H Simpson; G Walker
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 3.791

  4 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Establishing neonatal networks: the reality.

Authors:  Neil Marlow; A Bryan Gill
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Impact of service changes on neonatal transfer patterns over 10 years.

Authors:  Jonathan Cusack; David Field; Bradley Manktelow
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  Use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure during neonatal transfers.

Authors:  R K Bomont; I U Cheema
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2005-10-04       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  Managerial thinking in neonatal care: a qualitative study of place of care decision-making for preterm babies born at 27-31 weeks gestation in England.

Authors:  Caroline Cupit; Alexis Paton; Elaine Boyle; Thillagavathie Pillay; Natalie Armstrong
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  Time-to-delivery after maternal transfer to a tertiary perinatal centre.

Authors:  Fiona H Hutchinson; Mark W Davies
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.