Literature DB >> 15102677

Predictive models for breast cancer susceptibility from multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms.

Jennifer Listgarten1, Sambasivarao Damaraju, Brett Poulin, Lillian Cook, Jennifer Dufour, Adrian Driga, John Mackey, David Wishart, Russ Greiner, Brent Zanke.   

Abstract

Hereditary predisposition and causative environmental exposures have long been recognized in human malignancies. In most instances, cancer cases occur sporadically, suggesting that environmental influences are critical in determining cancer risk. To test the influence of genetic polymorphisms on breast cancer risk, we have measured 98 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) distributed over 45 genes of potential relevance to breast cancer etiology in 174 patients and have compared these with matched normal controls. Using machine learning techniques such as support vector machines (SVMs), decision trees, and naïve Bayes, we identified a subset of three SNPs as key discriminators between breast cancer and controls. The SVMs performed maximally among predictive models, achieving 69% predictive power in distinguishing between the two groups, compared with a 50% baseline predictive power obtained from the data after repeated random permutation of class labels (individuals with cancer or controls). However, the simpler naïve Bayes model as well as the decision tree model performed quite similarly to the SVM. The three SNP sites most useful in this model were (a) the +4536T/C site of the aldosterone synthase gene CYP11B2 at amino acid residue 386 Val/Ala (T/C) (rs4541); (b) the +4328C/G site of the aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase CYP1B1 at amino acid residue 293 Leu/Val (C/G) (rs5292); and (c) the +4449C/T site of the transcription factor BCL6 at amino acid 387 Asp/Asp (rs1056932). No single SNP site on its own could achieve more than 60% in predictive accuracy. We have shown that multiple SNP sites from different genes over distant parts of the genome are better at identifying breast cancer patients than any one SNP alone. As high-throughput technology for SNPs improves and as more SNPs are identified, it is likely that much higher predictive accuracy will be achieved and a useful clinical tool developed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15102677     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-1115-03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  45 in total

Review 1.  Modeling paradigms for medical diagnostic decision support: a survey and future directions.

Authors:  Kavishwar B Wagholikar; Vijayraghavan Sundararajan; Ashok W Deshpande
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  A support vector machine approach to assess drug efficacy of interferon-alpha and ribavirin combination therapy.

Authors:  Eugene Lin; Yuchi Hwang
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.074

3.  Association between the CYP1B1 polymorphisms and risk of cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jie-Ying Liu; Yu Yang; Zhi-Zhong Liu; Jian-Jun Xie; Ya-Ping Du; Wei Wang
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.291

Review 4.  Applications of Support Vector Machine (SVM) Learning in Cancer Genomics.

Authors:  Shujun Huang; Nianguang Cai; Pedro Penzuti Pacheco; Shavira Narrandes; Yang Wang; Wayne Xu
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.069

5.  Prostate cancer risk and aggressiveness associated with the CYP1B1 4326C/G (Leu432Val) polymorphism: a meta-analysis of 2788 cases and 2968 controls.

Authors:  Jie Yang; Dong-Liang Xu; Qiang Lu; Zhi-Jian Han; Jun Tao; Pei Lu; Chao Wang; Xiao-Ke Di; Min Gu
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  Association of CYP1B1 Polymorphisms with Breast Cancer: A Case-Control Study in the Han Population in Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, P. R. China.

Authors:  Haiyan Jiao; Chunlian Liu; Weidong Guo; Liang Peng; Yintao Chen; Francis L Martin
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2010-02-12

7.  Identification of type 2 diabetes-associated combination of SNPs using support vector machine.

Authors:  Hyo-Jeong Ban; Jee Yeon Heo; Kyung-Soo Oh; Keun-Joon Park
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 2.797

8.  Applications of machine learning in cancer prediction and prognosis.

Authors:  Joseph A Cruz; David S Wishart
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2007-02-11

9.  A comparison of classification methods for predicting Chronic Fatigue Syndrome based on genetic data.

Authors:  Lung-Cheng Huang; Sen-Yen Hsu; Eugene Lin
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 5.531

10.  Determining relative importance of variables in developing and validating predictive models.

Authors:  Joseph Beyene; Eshetu G Atenafu; Jemila S Hamid; Teresa To; Lillian Sung
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.