Literature DB >> 15100549

Imaging predictors of intracranial ependymomas.

Chi-Jen Chen1, Ying-Chi Tseng, Hui-Ling Hsu, Shih-Ming Jung.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify significant imaging prognostic factors for intracranial ependymomas.
METHODS: This series includes 32 patients (18 male and 14 female), with an age at surgery ranging from 1 to 69 years (median, 20.5 years). The preoperative images and medical records were reviewed. The following imaging predictors, including tumor size, consistency, signal character, enhanced pattern, calcification, hemorrhage, perifocal edema, and tumor spread, were analyzed by 2 radiologists independently. Overall survival and progression-free survival were calculated by the Kaplan and Meier method. The difference in these imaging predictors in terms of overall survival and progression-free survival was tested for statistical significance by the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was also performed using the Cox proportional hazard model.
RESULTS: The results revealed that the presence of tumor spread on preoperative images was the only significant imaging predictor in overall and progression-free survivals (P < 0.0001). The hazard ratio of progression-free survival in the presence of tumor spread on preoperative images was 18.59 (95% confidence interval: 1.57-220.13; P = 0.020).
CONCLUSION: The presence of tumor spread on preoperative images is the only significant imaging predictor for patients with intracranial ependymomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15100549     DOI: 10.1097/00004728-200405000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Infratentorial tumors].

Authors:  I Q Grunwald; C Veith; M Backens; C Roth; P Papanagiotou; W Reith
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  Ependymomas in adults.

Authors:  Mark R Gilbert; Roberta Ruda; Riccardo Soffietti
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.081

3.  [Differential diagnosis of space demands in the cerebellopontine angle].

Authors:  B Holst; I Q Grunwald; G Brill; W Reith
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 4.  [Supratentorial tumors].

Authors:  I Grunwald; K Dillmann; C Roth; M Backens; W Reith
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 5.  Surgical management and long-term outcome of intracranial subependymoma.

Authors:  Adithya Varma; David Giraldi; Samantha Mills; Andrew R Brodbelt; Michael D Jenkinson
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 2.216

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.