AIM: To analyse the role played by bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of infected joint prostheses. METHODS: The study included 77 patients, aged 32-77 years, in whom infection of a joint prosthesis (48 hip, 29 knee) was suspected. In all patients the following examinations were performed consecutively: a two-phase Tc methylene diphosphonate (Tc-MDP) bone scan, a Tc hexamethylproplyene amine oxime (Tc-HMPAO) labelled white blood cell (WBC) scan, and a Tc microcolloid bone marrow (BM) scan. The minimum interval between examinations was 48 h. The diagnoses were based on data obtained from bacteriological cultures. RESULTS: The bone scan was positive in all patients and 28 of them had an infection (sensitivity 100%, specificity 0%). The WBC scan was positive in 61 patients but only 27 had an infection. The WBC scan was negative in 16 patients, and the possibility of infection was discarded in 15 of these cases (sensitivity 96%, specificity 30%). The results of the bone marrow scan were not compatible with those of the WBC scan (suggestive of infection) in 27 patients: 26 of them had prosthesis infection. The results of both examinations were compatible in the other 34 patients and the possibility of infection was discarded in 33 of these patients (sensitivity 92.8%, specificity 98%). The addition of a BM scan to a WBC scan decreased the sensitivity from 96% to 92.8% but increased specificity from 30% to 98%. The addition of a bone scan to this dual combination did not alter the results. CONCLUSIONS: When infection of a prosthesis is suspected the diagnostic procedure should start with a WBC scan followed, if positive, by a BM scan. This procedure reduces the cost, the time required for a diagnosis, and the dose of radiation received by the patient.
AIM: To analyse the role played by bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of infected joint prostheses. METHODS: The study included 77 patients, aged 32-77 years, in whom infection of a joint prosthesis (48 hip, 29 knee) was suspected. In all patients the following examinations were performed consecutively: a two-phase Tc methylene diphosphonate (Tc-MDP) bone scan, a Tc hexamethylproplyene amine oxime (Tc-HMPAO) labelled white blood cell (WBC) scan, and a Tc microcolloid bone marrow (BM) scan. The minimum interval between examinations was 48 h. The diagnoses were based on data obtained from bacteriological cultures. RESULTS: The bone scan was positive in all patients and 28 of them had an infection (sensitivity 100%, specificity 0%). The WBC scan was positive in 61 patients but only 27 had an infection. The WBC scan was negative in 16 patients, and the possibility of infection was discarded in 15 of these cases (sensitivity 96%, specificity 30%). The results of the bone marrow scan were not compatible with those of the WBC scan (suggestive of infection) in 27 patients: 26 of them had prosthesis infection. The results of both examinations were compatible in the other 34 patients and the possibility of infection was discarded in 33 of these patients (sensitivity 92.8%, specificity 98%). The addition of a BM scan to a WBC scan decreased the sensitivity from 96% to 92.8% but increased specificity from 30% to 98%. The addition of a bone scan to this dual combination did not alter the results. CONCLUSIONS: When infection of a prosthesis is suspected the diagnostic procedure should start with a WBC scan followed, if positive, by a BM scan. This procedure reduces the cost, the time required for a diagnosis, and the dose of radiation received by the patient.
Authors: Filip Gemmel; Hans Van den Wyngaert; Charito Love; M M Welling; Paul Gemmel; Christopher J Palestro Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-02-24 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: P Fernandez; A Monet; C Matei; H De Clermont; M Guyot; R Jeandot; H Dutronc; C Dumoulin; M Dupon; D Ducassou Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2008-06-27 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Steven J Verberne; Remko J A Sonnega; Olivier P P Temmerman; Pieter G Raijmakers Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Karsten D Ottink; Stefan J Gelderman; Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker; Joris J W Ploegmakers; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Paul C Jutte Journal: J Bone Jt Infect Date: 2022-01-06