BACKGROUND: Our knowledge of afferent nerve fiber reinnervation of grafted skin following third-degree burn is limited by a lack of quantitative histological and psychophysical assessment from the same cutaneous area. The current study compares fiber profile and functional recovery measurements in injured and control skin from the same subject. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nerve regeneration and modality-specific sensory thresholds were compared using immunocytochemical labeling with protein gene product 9.5 antibody to stain all axons and anti-substance P to label substance P axons (which are predominantly unmyelinated), as well as computerized instrumentation to obtain psychophysical estimates. RESULTS: Compared to control skin, threshold measures of pinprick (P < 0.001), warming (P < 0.001), touch (P < 0.001), and vibration (P < 0.01) were significantly elevated in burn-graft skin and correlated with histological analysis of skin biopsies obtained from the same site. Immunohistochemical staining of all axons innervating the dermis and epidermis revealed a significant reduction in burn-graft relative to control skin (54% decrease, P < 0.0001). In contrast, the incidence of substance P nerve fibers was significantly elevated in burn-graft (177% increase, P < 0.05) and appeared to correlate with patient reports of pruritus and pain. CONCLUSIONS: Observations support the hypothesis that sensory regeneration is fiber-size-dependent in burn-graft skin. The findings that substance P fiber growth increased while total fiber count decreased and that thermal threshold showed the greatest degree of functional recovery suggest that unmyelinated neurons have the greater ability to transverse scar tissue and reinnervate grafted skin following third-degree burn injury.
BACKGROUND: Our knowledge of afferent nerve fiber reinnervation of grafted skin following third-degree burn is limited by a lack of quantitative histological and psychophysical assessment from the same cutaneous area. The current study compares fiber profile and functional recovery measurements in injured and control skin from the same subject. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nerve regeneration and modality-specific sensory thresholds were compared using immunocytochemical labeling with protein gene product 9.5 antibody to stain all axons and anti-substance P to label substance P axons (which are predominantly unmyelinated), as well as computerized instrumentation to obtain psychophysical estimates. RESULTS: Compared to control skin, threshold measures of pinprick (P < 0.001), warming (P < 0.001), touch (P < 0.001), and vibration (P < 0.01) were significantly elevated in burn-graft skin and correlated with histological analysis of skin biopsies obtained from the same site. Immunohistochemical staining of all axons innervating the dermis and epidermis revealed a significant reduction in burn-graft relative to control skin (54% decrease, P < 0.0001). In contrast, the incidence of substance P nerve fibers was significantly elevated in burn-graft (177% increase, P < 0.05) and appeared to correlate with patient reports of pruritus and pain. CONCLUSIONS: Observations support the hypothesis that sensory regeneration is fiber-size-dependent in burn-graft skin. The findings that substance P fiber growth increased while total fiber count decreased and that thermal threshold showed the greatest degree of functional recovery suggest that unmyelinated neurons have the greater ability to transverse scar tissue and reinnervate grafted skin following third-degree burn injury.
Authors: Thomas Biedermann; Sophie Böttcher-Haberzeth; Agnieszka S Klar; Luca Pontiggia; Clemens Schiestl; Claudia Meuli-Simmen; Ernst Reichmann; Martin Meuli Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 1.827
Authors: Thomas Biedermann; Agnieszka S Klar; Sophie Böttcher-Haberzeth; Clemens Schiestl; Ernst Reichmann; Martin Meuli Journal: Pediatr Surg Int Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 1.827
Authors: Thirthar P Vetrichevvel; Sean M Randall; Mark W Fear; Fiona M Wood; James H Boyd; Janine M Duke Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2016-09-08 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Jennifer M Hahn; Kelly A Combs; Christopher M Lloyd; Kevin L McFarland; Steven T Boyce; Dorothy M Supp Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-03-05 Impact factor: 3.240