Literature DB >> 15099957

Radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for stage IB2 cervical cancer.

Laura J Havrilesky1, Charles A Leath, Warner Huh, Brian Calingaert, Rex C Bentley, John T Soper, Angeles Alvarez Secord.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We wished to evaluate survival and adverse outcomes of patients with stage IB2 cervical cancer treated primarily with radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy.
METHODS: A review was performed of all patients undergoing primary radical hysterectomy for stage IB2 cervical cancer at two institutions from 1987 to 2002. Patients were stratified into low, intermediate (Gynecologic Oncology Group protocol 92 criteria), and high-risk (positive nodes, margins, or parametria) groups. Survival and progression-free interval were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Seventy-two patients underwent primary type III radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy (72 pelvic, 58 pelvic and paraaortic). Patients were classified as low (n = 6), intermediate (n = 49), or high (n = 17) risk for recurrence. Adjuvant therapy was administered to 94%, 12%, and 0% of the high-, intermediate-, and low-risk groups, respectively. Five-year survival was 72%, while 5-year progression-free survival was 63%. Five-year overall and progression-free survival by risk group were 47% and 40% (high-risk), 80% and 66% (intermediate-risk), 100% and 100% (low-risk). Predictors of survival in multivariate analysis were Caucasian race (P = 0.001), older age (P = 0.017), inner 2/3 cervical wall invasion (P = 0.045), and absence of lymph-vascular invasion (P < 0.001). Major complications were experienced by 10/72 (13.9%) patients. Among 34 patients who received radiation therapy, two (5.9%) experienced complications attributable to radiation.
CONCLUSIONS: Radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy followed by tailored adjuvant therapy is a reasonable alternative to primary radiotherapy for stage IB2 cervical cancer. Patients with low- and intermediate-risk factors have satisfactory results after primary surgical management. A prospective randomized trial will clarify the optimal mode of initial therapy for patients with stage IB2 disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15099957     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.01.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  15 in total

Review 1.  Up-to-date management of lymph node metastasis and the role of tailored lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Noriaki Sakuragi
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Sentinel lymph node evaluation in women with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Laura L Holman; Charles F Levenback; Michael Frumovitz
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 4.137

3.  Survival Outcomes of Patients With Stage IB3 Cervical Cancer Who Undergo Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy Versus Radiochemotherapy.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Li; Qing Yang; Jianxin Guo; Guoqiang Liang; Hui Duan; Shaoguang Wang; Min Hao; Wentong Liang; Donglin Li; Xuemei Zhan; Qinghuang Xie; Jinghe Lang; Ping Liu; Chunlin Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Sentinel lymph node detection rates using indocyanine green in women with early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  Anna L Beavis; Sergio Salazar-Marioni; Abdulrahman K Sinno; Rebecca L Stone; Amanda N Fader; Antonio Santillan-Gomez; Edward J Tanner
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Clear cell carcinoma of the cervix: a multi-institutional review in the post-DES era.

Authors:  M Bijoy Thomas; Jason D Wright; Aliza L Leiser; Dennis S Chi; David G Mutch; Karl C Podratz; Sean C Dowdy
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 6.  Type II or type III radical hysterectomy compared to chemoradiotherapy as a primary intervention for stage IB2 cervical cancer.

Authors:  Vivek Nama; Georgios Angelopoulos; Jeremy Twigg; John B Murdoch; Jo Bailey; Theresa A Lawrie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-12

7.  How important is the number of pelvic lymph node retrieved to locorregional staging of cervix cancer?

Authors:  Thales Paulo Batista; Artur Lício Rocha Bezerra; Mário Rino Martins; Vandré Cabral Gomes Carneiro
Journal:  Einstein (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013-12

8.  Comparison of outcomes between radical hysterectomy followed by tailored adjuvant therapy versus primary chemoradiation therapy in IB2 and IIA2 cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jeong-Yeol Park; Dae-Yeon Kim; Jong-Hyeok Kim; Yong-Man Kim; Young-Tak Kim; Young-Seok Kim; Ha Jeong Kim; Jeong-Won Lee; Byoung-Gie Kim; Duk-Soo Bae; Seung Jae Huh; Joo-Hyun Nam
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 4.401

9.  Utility of risk-weighted surgical-pathological factors in early-stage cervical cancer.

Authors:  K Matsuo; S Mabuchi; M Okazawa; Y Matsumoto; T Tsutsui; M Fujita; S Kamiura; K Ogawa; C P Morrow; T Kimura
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Clinical implication of surgically treated early-stage cervical cancer with multiple high-risk factors.

Authors:  Koji Matsuo; Seiji Mabuchi; Mika Okazawa; Mahiru Kawano; Hiromasa Kuroda; Shoji Kamiura; Tadashi Kimura
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 4.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.