Literature DB >> 15099647

Mechanical interface conditions affect morphology and cellular activity of sclerotic bone rims forming around experimental loaded implants.

Marianne Toft Vestermark1, Joan E Bechtold, Pascal Swider, Kjeld Søballe.   

Abstract

A characteristic bony structure found at revision surgery for failed joint replacement, and implicated as being associated with poorer subsequent implant fixation, is a sclerotic bone rim (SB rim). This study is a histomorphometric analysis of the SB rim formed around an experimental canine micro-motion implant system under stable or unstable conditions with polyethylene (PE) particles, after 8 weeks. A point count histomorphometric analysis was performed to determine the cellular activity at the surface of the SB rim, and the morphology of the structure was determined by image analysis. A SB rim was found to form under both stable and unstable conditions, but with unstable conditions the rim was more distinct, thick, continuous, and was located near the drill hole, and had high and ongoing formative activity at both surfaces with little resorption. Under stable conditions, thinner second or third SB rims were observed. The difference in width and distance between implant and the SB rim is significant (p<0.05), as was the difference in fraction of resorption surfaces at the SB surface facing the implant. This study observed an in vivo primary bone response to controlled stable and unstable loaded implants. Sclerosis of trabeculae in a semi-continuous SB rim can serve to isolate the implant from the marrow space. The increases in SB rim width and continuity is consistent with the previously demonstrated knowledge that increase of total bone mass and low risk for trabeculae perforation is the consequence of low resorptive and high formative activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15099647     DOI: 10.1016/j.orthres.2003.10.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  6 in total

1.  Do Bone Graft and Cracking of the Sclerotic Cavity Improve Fixation of Titanium and Hydroxyapatite-coated Revision Implants in an Animal Model?

Authors:  Brian Elmengaard; Joergen Baas; Thomas Jakobsen; Soren Kold; Thomas B Jensen; Joan E Bechtold; Kjeld Soballe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Arthrotomy-based preclinical models of particle-induced osteolysis: A systematic review.

Authors:  Meghan M Moran; Brittany M Wilson; Ryan D Ross; Amarjit S Virdi; Dale Rick Sumner
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 3.  Immunological reaction to magnesium-based implants for orthopedic applications. What do we know so far? A systematic review on in vivo studies.

Authors:  Omer Suljevic; Stefan F Fischerauer; Annelie M Weinberg; Nicole G Sommer
Journal:  Mater Today Bio       Date:  2022-06-09

4.  Fixation of hydroxyapatite-coated revision implants is improved by the surgical technique of cracking the sclerotic bone rim.

Authors:  Brian Elmengaard; Joan E Bechtold; Xinqian Chen; Kjeld Søballe
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Crack revision improves fixation of uncemented HA-coated implants compared with reaming: an experiment in dogs.

Authors:  Jorgen Baas; Brian Elmengaard; Thomas Jakobsen; Joan Bechtold; Kjeld Soballe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Characterization of bone-implant fixation using modal analysis: application to a press-fit implant model.

Authors:  P Swider; G Guérin; Joergen Baas; Kjeld Søballe; Joan E Bechtold
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 2.712

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.