Literature DB >> 15099612

Validity of the family history method for diagnosing schizophrenia, schizophrenia-related psychoses, and schizophrenia-spectrum personality disorders in first-degree relatives of schizophrenia probands.

David L Fogelson1, Keith H Nuechterlein, Robert F Asarnow, Diana L Payne, Kenneth L Subotnik.   

Abstract

This study examined the validity of the family history method for diagnosing schizophrenia, schizophrenia-related psychoses, and schizophrenia-spectrum personality disorders in first-degree relatives of schizophrenia probands. This is the first large-scale study that examined the validity of the family history method for diagnosing DSM-III-R personality disorders. The best estimate DSM-III-R diagnoses of 264 first-degree relatives of 117 adult-onset schizophrenia probands based on direct structured diagnostic interviews, family history interview, and medical records were compared to Family History Research Diagnostic Criteria (FH-RDC) diagnoses based on the NIMH Relative Psychiatric History Interview and to family history Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R: Personality Disorders (SCID-II) diagnoses based on the SCID-II adapted to a third person format. Diagnoses of relatives were made blind to proband diagnostic status. The median sensitivity for schizophrenia and the related psychoses was 29% (range 0-50%), the median specificity 99% (range 98-100%), and the median positive predictive value (PPV) 67% (range 20-80%). The median sensitivity for the personality diagnoses was 25% (range 14-71%), the median specificity 100% (range 99-100%), and the median PPV 100% (range 67-100%). The family history method has low sensitivity but has excellent specificity and PPV for schizophrenia, schizophrenia-related psychoses, and schizophrenia-spectrum personality disorders. The kappa coefficient for the family history method was moderately good for the psychoses (0.598) and for paranoid and schizotypal personality disorder (0.576). Using the family history method, the validity of making schizophrenia-related personality disorder diagnoses was comparable to that of making psychotic disorder diagnoses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15099612     DOI: 10.1016/S0920-9964(03)00081-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schizophr Res        ISSN: 0920-9964            Impact factor:   4.939


  11 in total

1.  Do we have any solid evidence of clinical utility about the pathophysiology of schizophrenia?

Authors:  Stephen M Lawrie; Bayanne Olabi; Jeremy Hall; Andrew M McIntosh
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 49.548

2.  Accuracy of family history information on epilepsy and other seizure disorders.

Authors:  R Ottman; C Barker-Cummings; C L Leibson; V M Vasoli; W A Hauser; J R Buchhalter
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-01-25       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Mothers' perspectives on their child's mental illness as compared to other complex disorders in their family: insights to inform genetic counseling practice.

Authors:  Denise M Lautenbach; Susan Hiraki; MaryAnn W Campion; Jehannine C Austin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Structural MRI correlates for vulnerability and resilience to major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Francesco Amico; Eva Meisenzahl; Nicolaos Koutsouleris; Maximilian Reiser; Hans-Juergen Möller; Thomas Frodl
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 6.186

5.  Avoidant personality disorder is a separable schizophrenia-spectrum personality disorder even when controlling for the presence of paranoid and schizotypal personality disorders The UCLA family study.

Authors:  D L Fogelson; K H Nuechterlein; R A Asarnow; D L Payne; K L Subotnik; K C Jacobson; M C Neale; K S Kendler
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Avoidant personality disorder symptoms in first-degree relatives of schizophrenia patients predict performance on neurocognitive measures: the UCLA family study.

Authors:  D L Fogelson; R A Asarnow; C A Sugar; K L Subotnik; K C Jacobson; M C Neale; K S Kendler; H Kuppinger; K H Nuechterlein
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  The validity of the family history screen for assessing family history of mental disorders.

Authors:  B J Milne; A Caspi; R Crump; R Poulton; M Rutter; M R Sears; T E Moffitt
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2009-01-05       Impact factor: 3.568

8.  The Polish Academic Version of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB): Evaluation of Psychometric Properties.

Authors:  Małgorzata Jędrasik-Styła; Agnieszka Ciołkiewicz; Rafał Styła; Magdalena Linke; Dorota Parnowska; Anna Gruszka; Mirella Denisiuk; Marek Jarema; Michael F Green; Adam Wichniak
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2015-09

Review 9.  Mothers and fathers do not accurately report each other's psychopathology.

Authors:  Randal G Ross; Sharon K Hunter; Gary O Zerbe; Kate Hanna
Journal:  Ment Illn       Date:  2012-07-26

10.  The impact of developmental instability on Voxel-Based Morphometry analyses of neuroanatomical abnormalities in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Matthew Euler; Robert J Thoma; Steven W Gangestad; Jose M Cañive; Ronald A Yeo
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 4.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.