BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is postulated as a complex disease, but the heritability and mode of inheritance are uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To determine if VTE (i) segregates in families; (ii) is attributable to inheritance, shared environment, or both; and (iii) the possible mode of inheritance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a family-based study of relatives from 751 probands (60% female) with objectively diagnosed VTE (without cancer), we performed complex segregation analyses corrected for mode of ascertainment, considering age-specific, non-gender- and gender-specific liability classes under Mendelian and non-Mendelian assumptions. We tested 12 models categorized into four model sets: (i) sporadic (assumes no genetic effect); (ii) Mendelian inheritance of a major gene (including dominant, additive, recessive or codominant classes); (iii) mixed model (Mendelian inheritance including the same four classes plus the effect of polygenes); and (iv) non-Mendelian. RESULTS: Among the 16 650 relatives, 753 (48% female) were affected with VTE, of whom 62% were first-degree relatives. The sporadic model was rejected in both non-gender- and gender-specific liability class analyses. Among the remaining gender-specific models, the unrestricted (non-Mendelian) inheritance model was favored with an estimated heritability of 0.52. Among the Mendelian models, the dominant mixed model was preferred, with an estimated heritability and major disease allele frequency of 0.62 and 0.25, respectively, suggesting an effect of several minor genes. CONCLUSION: A multifactorial non-Mendelian inheritance model was favored as the cause for VTE, while a model postulating a purely environmental cause was rejected. VTE is probably a result of multigenic action as well as environmental exposures.
BACKGROUND:Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is postulated as a complex disease, but the heritability and mode of inheritance are uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To determine if VTE (i) segregates in families; (ii) is attributable to inheritance, shared environment, or both; and (iii) the possible mode of inheritance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a family-based study of relatives from 751 probands (60% female) with objectively diagnosed VTE (without cancer), we performed complex segregation analyses corrected for mode of ascertainment, considering age-specific, non-gender- and gender-specific liability classes under Mendelian and non-Mendelian assumptions. We tested 12 models categorized into four model sets: (i) sporadic (assumes no genetic effect); (ii) Mendelian inheritance of a major gene (including dominant, additive, recessive or codominant classes); (iii) mixed model (Mendelian inheritance including the same four classes plus the effect of polygenes); and (iv) non-Mendelian. RESULTS: Among the 16 650 relatives, 753 (48% female) were affected with VTE, of whom 62% were first-degree relatives. The sporadic model was rejected in both non-gender- and gender-specific liability class analyses. Among the remaining gender-specific models, the unrestricted (non-Mendelian) inheritance model was favored with an estimated heritability of 0.52. Among the Mendelian models, the dominant mixed model was preferred, with an estimated heritability and major disease allele frequency of 0.62 and 0.25, respectively, suggesting an effect of several minor genes. CONCLUSION: A multifactorial non-Mendelian inheritance model was favored as the cause for VTE, while a model postulating a purely environmental cause was rejected. VTE is probably a result of multigenic action as well as environmental exposures.
Authors: Weihong Tang; Martina Teichert; Daniel I Chasman; John A Heit; Pierre-Emmanuel Morange; Guo Li; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Paul M Ridker; Aaron R Folsom; Nicholas L Smith; Nathan Pankratz; Frank W Leebeek; Guillaume Paré; Mariza de Andrade; Christophe Tzourio; Bruce M Psaty; Saonli Basu; Rikje Ruiter; Lynda Rose; Sebastian M Armasu; Thomas Lumley; Susan R Heckbert; André G Uitterlinden; Mark Lathrop; Kenneth M Rice; Mary Cushman; Albert Hofman; Jean-Charles Lambert; Nicole L Glazer; James S Pankow; Jacqueline C Witteman; Philippe Amouyel; Joshua C Bis; Edwin G Bovill; Xiaoxiao Kong; Russell P Tracy; Eric Boerwinkle; Jerome I Rotter; David-Alexandre Trégouët; Daan W Loth Journal: Genet Epidemiol Date: 2013-05-05 Impact factor: 2.135
Authors: Jihye Kim; Peter Kraft; Kaitlin A Hagan; Laura B Harrington; Sara Lindstroem; Christopher Kabrhel Journal: Genet Epidemiol Date: 2018-03-08 Impact factor: 2.135
Authors: Myung S Park; Grant M Spears; Kent R Bailey; Ailing Xue; Michael J Ferrara; Amy Headlee; Sabtir K Dhillon; Donald H Jenkins; Scott P Zietlow; William S Harmsen; Aneel A Ashrani; John A Heit Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Marta Crous-Bou; Immaculata De Vivo; Carlos A Camargo; Raphaëlle Varraso; Francine Grodstein; Majken K Jensen; Peter Kraft; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Sara Lindström; Christopher Kabrhel Journal: Thromb Haemost Date: 2016-06-16 Impact factor: 5.249
Authors: Marja K Puurunen; Philimon N Gona; Martin G Larson; Joanne M Murabito; Jared W Magnani; Christopher J O'Donnell Journal: Thromb Res Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 3.944