Literature DB >> 15099237

Lidocaine patch 5% reduces pain intensity and interference with quality of life in patients with postherpetic neuralgia: an effectiveness trial.

Nathaniel P Katz1, Arnold R Gammaitoni, Matthew W Davis, Robert H Dworkin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of the lidocaine patch 5% (Lidoderm), a targeted peripheral analgesic, in reducing pain intensity/interference with quality of life (QOL) among patients with postherpetic neuralgia (PHN).
DESIGN: Open-label, nonrandomized, effectiveness study; up to three patches applied to area of greatest pain for 12 hours per day for 28 days.
SETTING: Forty-two centers consisting of large institutional primary care programs and academic centers, including pain centers, neurologists, and pain specialists affiliated with a university. PATIENTS: Patients with PHN (N = 332). OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients completed the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form and global pain assessments at baseline, Days 7 and 14, and study conclusion. Physicians completed global assessments at baseline and study conclusion.
RESULTS: The mean time from onset of herpes zoster to treatment was 28 months. Use of the lidocaine patch 5% was associated with reductions in all mean pain intensity, pain interference with QOL, and composite scores at all time points (P = 0.0001). Overall, 66% of patients reported improvement in pain intensity, and 74% reported improved QOL by Day 7; approximately 43% who did not respond by Day 7 experienced improvement in pain intensity by Day 14. For all measures of pain intensity, relief, and interference with QOL, improvements from baseline were equally significant regardless of time since shingles onset. In all, approximately 60% of patients reported moderate to complete pain relief at final evaluation. The lidocaine patch 5% was well tolerated.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on results of previous randomized, controlled trials and the current study, designed to gauge response in the clinical practice setting, the lidocaine patch 5% should be considered a first-line therapy, alone or in combination with other agents, for PHN due to its efficacy, safety, minimal systemic side effects and drug interactions, and ease of administration. Although the lidocaine patch 5% was equally effective in longstanding PHN, it would appear prudent to begin therapy as early in the course of PHN as possible.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 15099237     DOI: 10.1046/j.1526-4637.2002.02050.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Med        ISSN: 1526-2375            Impact factor:   3.750


  18 in total

1.  Availability of a 5% lidocaine patch used prophylactically for venipuncture- or injection-related pain in children.

Authors:  Cheul-Hong Kim; Ji-Uk Yoon; Hyeon-Jung Lee; Sang-Wook Shin; Ji-Young Yoon; Gyeong-Jo Byeon
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Tolerability of treatments for postherpetic neuralgia.

Authors:  Nancy A Alvarez
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Prevalence and psychiatric correlates of pain interference among men and women in the general population.

Authors:  Declan T Barry; Corey Pilver; Marc N Potenza; Rani A Desai
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 4.791

4.  Treatment of neuropathic pain with 5% lidocaine-medicated plaster: Five years of clinical experience.

Authors:  Claire Delorme; Marie L Navez; Valérie Legout; Rodrigue Deleens; Dominique Moyse
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.037

Review 5.  Topical analgesics for neuropathic pain in the elderly: current and future prospects.

Authors:  Jana Sawynok
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of a lidocaine 5% medicated plaster compared with gabapentin and pregabalin for treating postherpetic neuralgia: a german perspective.

Authors:  Hiltrud Liedgens; Nadine Hertel; Anja Gabriel; Mark Nuijten; Helen Dakin; Stephen Mitchell; Barbara Poulsen Nautrup
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 7.  Review of lidocaine patch 5% studies in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia.

Authors:  Pamela S Davies; Bradley S Galer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Cost effectiveness of a lidocaine 5% medicated plaster compared with pregabalin for the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia in the UK: a Markov model analysis.

Authors:  Mark Ritchie; Hiltrud Liedgens; Mark Nuijten
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.859

9.  Topical 5% lidocaine (lignocaine) medicated plaster treatment for post-herpetic neuralgia: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational efficacy and safety trial.

Authors:  Andreas Binder; Jean Bruxelle; Peter Rogers; Guy Hans; Irmgard Bösl; Ralf Baron
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.859

10.  Influence of anatomic location of lidocaine patch 5% on effectiveness and tolerability for postherpetic neuralgia.

Authors:  Srinivas Nalamachu; Matthew Wieman; Leah Bednarek; Surya Chitra
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.