Jean-Venable Goode1, Kim Swiger, Benjamin M Bluml. 1. Medical College of Virginia School of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University, 410 North 12th Street, P.O. Box 980533, Richmond, VA 23298-0533, USA. jrgoode@vcu.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: (1) To identify patients at risk for osteoporosis through community pharmacy-based bone mineral density (BMD) screening, to refer at-risk patients to primary care and/or specialty practice physicians, and to follow-up with at-risk patients; (2) to treat and manage osteopenic and osteoporotic patients referred to the pharmacy for medication therapy management services; and (3) to test a payment methodology for pharmacists who deliver community health management services to a population at risk for or diagnosed with osteoporosis. DESIGN: Single-cohort observational study. SETTING: Ukrop's Super Markets, Inc. Grocery and Pharmacy, a 29-store chain with 22 pharmacy locations in Richmond, Virginia. PARTICIPANTS: Consumers with one or more known risk factors for osteoporosis in Ukrop's customer service area. INTERVENTION: During the initial phase (health promotion and disease prevention) of the project, pharmacy-based osteoporosis screening with referral and follow-up was provided to consumers who responded to Ukrop's screening promotions. The second phase-provision of collaborative community health management services focused on osteoporosis monitoring and management--is ongoing and includes patients who are at risk for or diagnosed with osteoporosis and are covered by a regional payer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Results of screenings; responses of patients and physicians to notifications; and long-term results during collaborative care. RESULTS: The pharmacists screened 532 patients and were able to contact 305 of these patients for follow-up interviews 3 to 6 months later. The stratification for risk of fracture was 37%, high risk; 33%, moderate risk; and 30%, low risk. A total of 78% of patients indicated that they had no prior knowledge of their risk for future fracture. In the moderate- and high-risk categories, 37% of patients scheduled and completed a physician visit, 19% had a diagnostic scan, and 24% of those patients were initiated on osteoporosis therapy subsequent to the screening. Participating pharmacies received payment for both the osteoporosis screening and the collaborative health management services. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists can play a useful role in the identification, education, and referral of patients at risk for osteoporosis through pharmacy-based BMD screening. Patients are willing to pay for pharmacy-based osteoporosis screening services. Third-party payers are willing to compensate pharmacists for collaborative community health management services.
OBJECTIVE: (1) To identify patients at risk for osteoporosis through community pharmacy-based bone mineral density (BMD) screening, to refer at-risk patients to primary care and/or specialty practice physicians, and to follow-up with at-risk patients; (2) to treat and manage osteopenic and osteoporoticpatients referred to the pharmacy for medication therapy management services; and (3) to test a payment methodology for pharmacists who deliver community health management services to a population at risk for or diagnosed with osteoporosis. DESIGN: Single-cohort observational study. SETTING: Ukrop's Super Markets, Inc. Grocery and Pharmacy, a 29-store chain with 22 pharmacy locations in Richmond, Virginia. PARTICIPANTS: Consumers with one or more known risk factors for osteoporosis in Ukrop's customer service area. INTERVENTION: During the initial phase (health promotion and disease prevention) of the project, pharmacy-based osteoporosis screening with referral and follow-up was provided to consumers who responded to Ukrop's screening promotions. The second phase-provision of collaborative community health management services focused on osteoporosis monitoring and management--is ongoing and includes patients who are at risk for or diagnosed with osteoporosis and are covered by a regional payer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Results of screenings; responses of patients and physicians to notifications; and long-term results during collaborative care. RESULTS: The pharmacists screened 532 patients and were able to contact 305 of these patients for follow-up interviews 3 to 6 months later. The stratification for risk of fracture was 37%, high risk; 33%, moderate risk; and 30%, low risk. A total of 78% of patients indicated that they had no prior knowledge of their risk for future fracture. In the moderate- and high-risk categories, 37% of patients scheduled and completed a physician visit, 19% had a diagnostic scan, and 24% of those patients were initiated on osteoporosis therapy subsequent to the screening. Participating pharmacies received payment for both the osteoporosis screening and the collaborative health management services. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists can play a useful role in the identification, education, and referral of patients at risk for osteoporosis through pharmacy-based BMD screening. Patients are willing to pay for pharmacy-based osteoporosis screening services. Third-party payers are willing to compensate pharmacists for collaborative community health management services.