Literature DB >> 15098791

Endoscope-assisted laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcers.

Kun-Hua Lee1, Hung-Chi Chang, Chong-Jeh Lo.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic repairs for perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) are likely to fail in patients with shock, gastric outlet obstruction, or large perforations. This prospective study was performed to evaluate a revised approach of laparoscopic repair with endoscopic assistance to treat these patients. Between April 2001 and February 2002, 30 consecutive patients with PPU were enrolled in this study. The mean age was 43.1 +/- 12.2 years. Male to female ratio was 27:2. One patient was excluded from laparoscopic repair due to a gastric outlet obstruction. The other 29 patients were managed according to a protocol of preoperative upper endoscopy and laparoscopic intracorporeal suture repair with an omental patch. The average operative time was 58.1 +/- 13.5 minutes (range, 36-96 min). The average diameter of perforation was 4.2 +/- 2.0 mm (range, 1-12 mm). The average time to resume oral fluids was 3.2 +/- 0.8 days (range, 2-8 days). The average hospital stay was 4.7 +/- 1.1 days (range, 3-10 days). There was no leakage or mortality. Most patients did not receive parenteral analgesics postoperatively. We conclude that endoscope-assisted laparoscopic repair for PPU is safe and effective. This revised technique allows surgeons to exclude patients who are likely to fail the laparoscopic repair.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15098791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  9 in total

1.  Risk factors influencing the early outcome results after laparoscopic repair of perforated duodenal ulcer and their predictive value.

Authors:  Raimundas Lunevicius; Matas Morkevicius
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 2.  Management strategies, early results, benefits, and risk factors of laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Raimundas Lunevicius; Matas Morkevicius
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Assessing the invasiveness of NOTES perforated viscus repair: a comparative study of NOTES and laparoscopy.

Authors:  E A Moran; C J Gostout; A L McConico; J Michalek; M Huebner; Juliane Bingener
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for patients with perforated peptic ulcer.

Authors:  Eduardo A Bonin; Erica Moran; Christopher J Gostout; Andrea L McConico; Martin Zielinski; Juliane Bingener
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Conversion of laparoscopic surgery for perforated peptic ulcer: a single-center study.

Authors:  Markus Zimmermann; Martin Hoffmann; Tilman Laubert; Carlo Jung; Hans-Peter Bruch; Erik Schloericke
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Gastrotomy closure using bioabsorbable plugs in a canine model.

Authors:  Theodore J Cios; Kevin M Reavis; David R Renton; Jeffrey W Hazey; Dean J Mikami; Vimal K Narula; Matthew T Allemang; S Scott Davis; W Scott Melvin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-19       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Feasibility of NOTES omental plug repair of perforated peptic ulcers: results from a clinical pilot trial.

Authors:  Juliane Bingener; Erica A Loomis; Christopher J Gostout; Martin D Zielinski; Navtej S Buttar; Louis M Wong Kee Song; Todd H Baron; Leili Shahgholi Ghahfarokhi; Elizabeth Rajan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  A pilot study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of urgent endoscopy for gastroduodenal perforation.

Authors:  Naoki Asayama; Shinji Nagata; Mikihiro Kano; Kenjiro Shigita; Taiki Aoyama; Akira Fukumoto; Shinichi Mukai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Laparoscopic correction of perforated peptic ulcer: first choice? A review of literature.

Authors:  Mariëtta J O E Bertleff; Johan F Lange
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.