OBJECTIVE: We analyzed laboratory results from corneal ulcers seen from 1976 to 1999 at the Francis I. Proctor Foundation, a referral center in San Francisco, to determine the relative frequencies of pathogens and to analyze for trends in frequencies of the most common pathogens. The results were compared with a previous study of corneal ulcers seen from 1948 to 1976 at the same institution. METHODS: Ulcers presenting to the Proctor Foundation were Gram stained and cultured using standard techniques. Herpetic corneal ulcers were excluded from the study. RESULTS: Organisms were isolated from 427 ulcers, 38% of all cases. Two hundred seventy-eight (59%) isolates were gram-positive bacteria, 145 (31%) gram-negative bacteria, 16 (3%) Acanthamoeba spp., and 36 (8%) fungi. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common organism, composing 20% of all isolates, followed by viridans group streptococci (12%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (11%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (6%), Moraxella spp. (5%), and Serratia marcescens (4%). Over the 24-year study period the proportion of positive cultures decreased and the incidence of S. marcescens increased significantly. Comparing the period of 1948-1976 to 1976-1999, the frequency of S. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa decreased, and that of S. marcescens increased significantly. CONCLUSION: The common pathogens associated with corneal ulcers have changed over the past 50 years in Northern California, with S. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa being isolated relatively less often and S. marcescens being isolated with increasing frequency. The decrease in isolation of organisms over the 1976-1999 period may have resulted from increasing empiric antibiotic treatment by referring ophthalmologists.
OBJECTIVE: We analyzed laboratory results from corneal ulcers seen from 1976 to 1999 at the Francis I. Proctor Foundation, a referral center in San Francisco, to determine the relative frequencies of pathogens and to analyze for trends in frequencies of the most common pathogens. The results were compared with a previous study of corneal ulcers seen from 1948 to 1976 at the same institution. METHODS:Ulcers presenting to the Proctor Foundation were Gram stained and cultured using standard techniques. Herpetic corneal ulcers were excluded from the study. RESULTS: Organisms were isolated from 427 ulcers, 38% of all cases. Two hundred seventy-eight (59%) isolates were gram-positive bacteria, 145 (31%) gram-negative bacteria, 16 (3%) Acanthamoeba spp., and 36 (8%) fungi. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common organism, composing 20% of all isolates, followed by viridans group streptococci (12%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (11%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (6%), Moraxella spp. (5%), and Serratia marcescens (4%). Over the 24-year study period the proportion of positive cultures decreased and the incidence of S. marcescens increased significantly. Comparing the period of 1948-1976 to 1976-1999, the frequency of S. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa decreased, and that of S. marcescens increased significantly. CONCLUSION: The common pathogens associated with corneal ulcers have changed over the past 50 years in Northern California, with S. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa being isolated relatively less often and S. marcescens being isolated with increasing frequency. The decrease in isolation of organisms over the 1976-1999 period may have resulted from increasing empiric antibiotic treatment by referring ophthalmologists.
Authors: Prajna Lalitha; Muthiah Srinivasan; P Manikandan; M Jayahar Bharathi; Revathi Rajaraman; Meenakshi Ravindran; Vicky Cevallos; Catherine E Oldenburg; Kathryn J Ray; Christine M Toutain-Kidd; David V Glidden; Michael E Zegans; Stephen D McLeod; Nisha R Acharya; Thomas M Lietman Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2012-03-23 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Muthiah Srinivasan; Jeena Mascarenhas; Revathi Rajaraman; Meenakshi Ravindran; Prajna Lalitha; David V Glidden; Kathryn J Ray; Kevin C Hong; Catherine E Oldenburg; Salena M Lee; Michael E Zegans; Stephen D McLeod; Thomas M Lietman; Nisha R Acharya Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2011-10-10
Authors: Muthiah Srinivasan; Jeena Mascarenhas; Revathi Rajaraman; Meenakshi Ravindran; Prajna Lalitha; David V Glidden; Kathryn J Ray; Kevin C Hong; Catherine E Oldenburg; Salena M Lee; Michael E Zegans; Stephen D McLeod; Thomas M Lietman; Nisha R Acharya Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2011-10-10
Authors: Kimberly M Brothers; Regis P Kowalski; Shenghe Tian; Paul R Kinchington; Robert M Q Shanks Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2017-12-27 Impact factor: 3.467
Authors: Melissa E Sanders; Nathan A Tullos; Sidney D Taylor; Erin W Norcross; Lauren B King; Isaiah Tolo; Mary E Marquart Journal: Curr Eye Res Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 2.424
Authors: Cyril Dalmon; Travis C Porco; Thomas M Lietman; N Venkatesh Prajna; Lalitha Prajna; Mano Ranjan Das; J Arun Kumar; Jeena Mascarenhas; Todd P Margolis; John P Whitcher; Bennie H Jeng; Jeremy D Keenan; Matilda F Chan; Stephen D McLeod; Nisha R Acharya Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-04-02 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Namperumalsamy V Prajna; Jeena Mascarenhas; Tiruvengada Krishnan; P Ravindranath Reddy; Lalitha Prajna; Muthiah Srinivasan; C M Vaitilingam; Kevin C Hong; Salena M Lee; Stephen D McLeod; Michael E Zegans; Travis C Porco; Thomas M Lietman; Nisha R Acharya Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2010-06
Authors: Durga S Borkar; Suzanne M J Fleiszig; Chelsia Leong; Prajna Lalitha; Muthiah Srinivasan; Avanti A Ghanekar; Connie Tam; Wing Y Li; Michael E Zegans; Stephen D McLeod; Thomas M Lietman; Nisha R Acharya Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Aileen Sy; Muthiah Srinivasan; Jeena Mascarenhas; Prajna Lalitha; Revathi Rajaraman; Meenakshi Ravindran; Catherine E Oldenburg; Kathryn J Ray; David Glidden; Michael E Zegans; Stephen D McLeod; Thomas M Lietman; Nisha R Acharya Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2012-01-25 Impact factor: 4.799