Literature DB >> 15095089

Impacts of major predators on tropical agroforest arthropods: comparisons within and across taxa.

Stacy M Philpott1, Russell Greenberg, Peter Bichier, Ivette Perfecto.   

Abstract

In food web studies, taxonomically unrelated predators are often grouped into trophic levels regardless of their relative importance on prey assemblages, multiple predator effects, or interactions such as omnivory. Ants and birds are important predators likely to differentially shape arthropod assemblages, but no studies have compared their effects on a shared prey base. In two separate studies, we excluded birds and ants from branches of a canopy tree ( Inga micheliana) in a coffee farm in Mexico for 2 months in the dry and wet seasons of 2002. We investigated changes in arthropod densities with and without predation pressure from (1) birds and (2) ant assemblages dominated by one of two ant species ( Azteca instabilis and Camponotus senex). We first analyzed individual effects of each predator (birds, Azteca instabilis, and C. senex) then used a per day effect metric to compare differences in effects across (birds vs ants) and within predator taxa (the two ant species). Individually, birds reduced densities of total and large arthropods and some arthropod orders (e.g., spiders, beetles, roaches) in both seasons. Azteca instabilis did not significantly affect arthropods (total, small, large or specific orders). Camponotus senex, however, tended to remove arthropods (total, small), especially in the dry season, and affected arthropod densities of some orders both positively and negatively. Predators greatly differed in their effects on Inga arthropods (for all, small, large, and individual orders of arthropods) both in sign (+/-) and magnitudes of effects. Birds had stronger negative effects on arthropods than ants and the two dominant ant species had stronger effects on arthropods in different seasons. Our results show that aggregating taxonomically related and unrelated predators into trophic levels without prior experimental data quantifying the sign and strengths of effects may lead to a misrepresentation of food web interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15095089     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-004-1561-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  17 in total

1.  Trophic Cascades in Terrestrial Systems: A Review of the Effects of Carnivore Removals on Plants.

Authors:  Oswald J Schmitz; Peter A Hambäck; Andrew P Beckerman
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Mapping functional similarity of predators on the basis of trait similarities.

Authors:  David R Chalcraft; William J Resetarits
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-09-08       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Effect size in ecological experiments: the application of biological models in meta-analysis.

Authors:  C W Osenberg; O Sarnelle; S D Cooper
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  A comparative analysis of food-niche relationships and trophic guild structure in two assemblages of vertebrate predators differing in species richness: causes, correlations, and consequences.

Authors:  F M Jaksić; M Delibes
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The role of ant-tended extrafloral nectaries in the protection and benefit of a Neotropical rainforest tree.

Authors:  Marie Ann S de la Fuente; Robert J Marquis
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Effects of taxonomic and trophic aggregation on food web properties.

Authors:  George Sugihara; L-F Bersier; Kenneth Schoenly
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  COEVOLUTION OF MUTUALISM BETWEEN ANTS AND ACACIAS IN CENTRAL AMERICA.

Authors:  Daniel H Janzen
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1966-09       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Explaining the abundance of ants in lowland tropical rainforest canopies.

Authors:  Diane W Davidson; Steven C Cook; Roy R Snelling; Tock H Chua
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Dominant meat ants affect only their specialist predator in an epigaeic arthropod community.

Authors:  Heloise Gibb
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-07-03       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Birds defend trees from herbivores in a Neotropical forest canopy.

Authors:  Sunshine A Van Bael; Jeffrey D Brawn; Scott K Robinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-06-27       Impact factor: 12.779

View more
  7 in total

1.  The direct and indirect effects of insectivory by birds in two contrasting Neotropical forests.

Authors:  Sunshine A Van Bael; Jeffrey D Brawn
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The direct and indirect effects of insectivory by birds in two contrasting Neotropical forests.

Authors:  S A Van Bael; J D Brawn
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Interaction complexity matters: disentangling services and disservices of ant communities driving yield in tropical agroecosystems.

Authors:  Arno Wielgoss; Teja Tscharntke; Alfianus Rumede; Brigitte Fiala; Hannes Seidel; Saleh Shahabuddin; Yann Clough
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Ant exclusion in citrus over an 8-year period reveals a pervasive yet changing effect of ants on a Mediterranean spider assemblage.

Authors:  L Mestre; J Piñol; J A Barrientos; X Espadaler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Vertical heterogeneity in predation pressure in a temperate forest canopy.

Authors:  Kathleen R Aikens; Laura L Timms; Christopher M Buddle
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Behavior and body size modulate the defense of toxin-containing sawfly larvae against ants.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Boevé
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Shade tree diversity, cocoa pest damage, yield compensating inputs and farmers' net returns in West Africa.

Authors:  Hervé Bertin Bisseleua Daghela; Hervé Bertin Daghela Bisseleua; Daniel Fotio; Alain Didier Missoup; Stefan Vidal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.