Literature DB >> 15094340

Physiological responses to photoperiod in three cardueline finch species.

Thomas P Hahn1, Maria E Pereyra, Susan M Sharbaugh, George E Bentley.   

Abstract

Cardueline finches (canaries, goldfinches, and rosefinches, etc.) vary widely in the degree to which their natural reproductive schedules track seasonal changes in photoperiod. In this study, we tested for photo-induction of reproductive development and photorefractoriness in males of three cardueline finch species: pine siskins (Carduelis pinus), common redpolls (Carduelis flammea), and white-winged crossbills (Loxia leucoptera). Exposure to long days (20L:4D) in winter induced gonadal growth and elevation of circulating luteinizing hormone (LH) in all three species. After 4.5 months on constant long days, gonadal regression was complete in redpolls and siskins, but only partial in crossbills. Feather molt was most advanced in redpolls, slightly less advanced in siskins, and least advanced in crossbills. These results indicate that the reproductive systems of all three species were stimulated by long days, but that the crossbills, which are temporal opportunists, either did not become absolutely photorefractory, or developed refractoriness more slowly than did the other two species. Reproductive development of controls held for 4.5 months on constant short days (5L:19D) was negligible in redpolls and crossbills, but substantial in siskins, suggesting that of the three species, pine siskins may be the least dependent on long days for reproductive development. Changes in fat deposition and body mass also differed among species. Short day redpolls tended to be fatter and heavier than long day redpolls, and long day crossbills tended to be fatter and heavier than short day crossbills. Body mass and fat depot of siskins remained high irrespective of photoperiod. These results illustrate substantial variation among these close relatives, and are consistent with the idea that differences in apparent reproductive flexibility among cardueline taxa relate to interspecific differences in responsiveness to environmental cues, not simply to differences in the environments experienced. This kind of information is critical to an understanding of the mechanistic bases of natural variation in reproductive schedules, and of how different species may be affected by modifications to the environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15094340     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2004.02.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gen Comp Endocrinol        ISSN: 0016-6480            Impact factor:   2.822


  10 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in behavioral neuroendocrinology: insights from studies on birds.

Authors:  James L Goodson; Colin J Saldanha; Thomas P Hahn; Kiran K Soma
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.587

Review 2.  Review. Do hormonal control systems produce evolutionary inertia?

Authors:  Elizabeth Adkins-Regan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Control of the annual cycle in birds: endocrine constraints and plasticity in response to ecological variability.

Authors:  Alistair Dawson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Adaptive specialization, conditional plasticity and phylogenetic history in the reproductive cue response systems of birds.

Authors:  Thomas P Hahn; Scott A MacDougall-Shackleton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-01-27       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Photoperiodic induced changes in reproductive state of border canaries (Serinus canaria) are associated with marked variation in hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone immunoreactivity and the volume of song control regions.

Authors:  Laura L Hurley; Andrea M Wallace; Jennifer J Sartor; Gregory F Ball
Journal:  Gen Comp Endocrinol       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 2.822

6.  Variation in gonadotrophin-releasing hormone-1 gene expression in the preoptic area predicts transitions in seasonal reproductive state.

Authors:  T J Stevenson; T P Hahn; G F Ball
Journal:  J Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.627

7.  Seasonal adaptation of dwarf hamsters (Genus Phodopus): differences between species and their geographic origin.

Authors:  D Müller; J Hauer; K Schöttner; P Fritzsche; D Weinert
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 2.200

8.  Non-photoperiodic regulation of reproductive physiology in the flexibly breeding pine siskin (Spinus pinus).

Authors:  Heather E Watts; Thomas P Hahn
Journal:  Gen Comp Endocrinol       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 2.822

9.  A potential mate influences reproductive development in female, but not male, pine siskins.

Authors:  Heather E Watts; Bruce Edley; Thomas P Hahn
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 3.587

10.  Hatching phenology is lagging behind an advancing snowmelt pattern in a high-alpine bird.

Authors:  Christian Schano; Carole Niffenegger; Tobias Jonas; Fränzi Korner-Nievergelt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.