Literature DB >> 15094144

Are hamstrings activated to counteract shear forces during isometric knee extension efforts in healthy subjects?

Idsart Kingma1, Sietske Aalbersberg, Jaap H van Dieën.   

Abstract

The hamstring muscles have the potential to counteract anterior shear forces at the knee joint by co-contracting during knee extension efforts. Such a muscle recruitment pattern might protect the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) by reducing its strain. In this study we investigated to what extent co-activation of the knee flexors during extension efforts is compatible with the hypothesis that this co-activation serves to counteract anterior tibial shear forces during isometric knee extension efforts in healthy subjects. To this aim, it is investigated whether co-activation varies with the required knee extension moment, with the knee joint angle, and with the position of the external flexing force relative to the knee joint. With unaltered moment and muscle activation, distal positioning of the flexing force on the tibia causes higher resultant (muscular plus external) forward shear forces at the knee as compared to proximal positioning. In ten subjects, knee flexor and extensor EMG was measured during a quasi-isometric positioning task for a range (5-50 degrees) of knee flexion angles. It was found that the co-activation of the knee flexors increased with the extension moment, but this increase was less than proportional (p<0.001). The extension moment increased 2.7 to 3.4 times, whereas the activation of Biceps Femoris and Semitendinosus increased only a factor 1.3 to 2.0 (joint angle dependent). Furthermore, a strong increase in co-activation was seen near full extension of the knee joint. The position of the external extension load on the tibia did not affect the level of co-contraction. It is argued that these results do not suggest a recruitment pattern that is directed at reduction of anterior shear forces in the knee joint during sub-maximal isometric knee extension efforts in healthy subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15094144     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2004.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  5 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of non-contact ACL injuries.

Authors:  Bing Yu; William E Garrett
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Effect of varying hamstring tension on anterior cruciate ligament strain during in vitro impulsive knee flexion and compression loading.

Authors:  Thomas J Withrow; Laura J Huston; Edward M Wojtys; James A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Selective contribution of each hamstring muscle to anterior cruciate ligament protection and tibiofemoral joint stability in leg-extension exercise: a simulation study.

Authors:  Andrea Biscarini; Fabio Massimo Botti; Vito Enrico Pettorossi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Age- and sex-related differences in muscle activation for a discrete functional task.

Authors:  B Harwood; D L Edwards; J M Jakobi
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Empirical quantification of internal and external rotation muscular co-activation ratios in healthy shoulders.

Authors:  Rebecca L Brookham; Clark R Dickerson
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 2.602

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.