Literature DB >> 15093895

Primary tumor volume of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: prognostic significance for local control.

Wai-Man Sze1, Anne W M Lee, Tsz-Kok Yau, Rebecca M W Yeung, Kam-Ying Lau, Samuel K C Leung, Albert W M Hung, Michael C H Lee, Rick Chappell, Kuen Chan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the prognostic significance of primary tumor volume on local control of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1998 and 2001, 308 consecutive patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with radical intent were staged with MRI. On the basis of the extent of tumor infiltration outlined by a diagnostic radiologist, the gross tumor volume of the primary and involved retropharyngeal nodes (GTV-P) was delineated by a radiation oncologist for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy to the nasopharyngeal region using the Helax-TMS Planning System. All patients were treated with 2 Gy daily to a total dose of 70 Gy in 6-7 weeks. Additionally, chemotherapy was given to 128 patients (42%).
RESULTS: The median GTV-P for the whole series was 22 cm(3) (range, 1.4-218 cm(3)). Although the GTV-P varied substantially within each T stage, the overall correlation between these two parameters was strongly significant (p <0.01), with the median GTV-P 2.7 cm(3) for T1, 13.2 cm(3) for T2, 28.1 cm(3) for T3, and 65.5 cm(3) for T4. With a median follow-up of 1.9 years (range, 0.1-3.9 years), the 3-year local failure-free rate was 87%. The 3-year local failure-free rate was 97% for patients with a GTV-P <15 cm(3) compared with 82% for those with a GTV-P > or =15 cm(3) (p <0.01). On multivariate analysis (with T stage as a covariate), GTV-P remained an independent prognostic factor for the local failure-free rate (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.02; p <0.01).
CONCLUSION: Our data suggested that GTV-P is a strongly significant factor for predicting local control of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The risk of local failure was estimated to increase by 1% for every 1 cm(3) increase in primary tumor volume.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15093895     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2003.10.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  39 in total

1.  Prognostic nomogram for refining the prognostication of the proposed 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC staging system for nasopharyngeal cancer in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jian Ji Pan; Wai Tong Ng; Jing Feng Zong; Sarah W M Lee; Horace C W Choi; Lucy L K Chan; Shao Jun Lin; Qiao Juan Guo; Henry C K Sze; Yun Bin Chen; You Ping Xiao; Wai Kuen Kan; Brian O'Sullivan; Wei Xu; Quynh Thu Le; Christine M Glastonbury; A Dimitrios Colevas; Randal S Weber; William Lydiatt; Jatin P Shah; Anne W M Lee
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  The evolution of nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging.

Authors:  Rui Guo; Yan-Ping Mao; Ling-Long Tang; Lei Chen; Ying Sun; Jun Ma
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  The relationship between nasopharyngeal carcinoma tumor volume and TNM T-classification: a quantitative analysis.

Authors:  Jia-Yin Zhou; Vincent F H Chong; James B K Khoo; Kap-Luk Chan; Jing Huang
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Volumetry of Primary Nasopharyngeal Cancer in Patients Treated with Induction Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Followed by Concurrent Cisplatin and Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy.

Authors:  Joshua Giambattista; Nevin McVicar; Sarah Hamilton; Montgomery Martin; Benjamin Maas; Cheryl Ho; Jonn Wu; Eric Tran; John Hay; Eric Berthelet
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-09-13

5.  The change in tumor volume after induction chemotherapy with docetaxel plus cisplatin in 259 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Shan Li; Liangfang Shen
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Current management strategy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  William I Wei; Dora L W Kwong
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 3.372

7.  Prognostic value of tumor volume in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Jeong-Hyun Kim; Joon-Kyoo Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2005-04-30       Impact factor: 2.759

8.  Clinical application of tumor volume in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma to predict outcome.

Authors:  Ching-Chih Lee; Tze-Ta Huang; Moon-Sing Lee; Shih-Hsuan Hsiao; Hon-Yi Lin; Yu-Chieh Su; Feng-Chun Hsu; Shih-Kai Hung
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Validation of bidimensional measurement in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Ting-Shou Chang; Sau-Tung Chu; Yu-Yi Hou; Kuo-Ping Chang; Chao-Chuan Chi; Ching-Chih Lee
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 10.  Tumour volume measurement in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Vincent F H Chong
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.