Literature DB >> 15093757

Willingness of patients to switch from conventional to daily hemodialysis: looking before we leap.

Scott D Halpern1, Jeffrey S Berns, Ajay K Israni.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the willingness of patients with end-stage renal disease to switch from conventional hemodialysis to short daily hemodialysis, and to determine what health benefits clinical trials of daily hemodialysis would have to document for patients to switch regimens.
METHODS: We studied all patients receiving conventional hemodialysis (defined as three times per week) at three dialysis centers in Philadelphia during a 4-month period. Patients indicated their willingness to switch to daily hemodialysis (defined as six 2- to 3-hour in-center treatments per week) in each of 21 scenarios presented via an interactive computer display. We used conjoint analysis to determine how patients' decisions were influenced by four attributes of daily hemodialysis: predicted life expectancy, quality of life, number of annual hospitalizations, and weekly transportation time to and from the dialysis center.
RESULTS: Of 126 patients interviewed, 55 (44%) would not choose daily hemodialysis regardless of its health benefits. The remaining 71 patients (56%) indicated that they would consider switching if daily hemodialysis was shown to yield certain health benefits. Patients were more willing to switch to daily hemodialysis as the associated life expectancy and average quality of life increased, and as the number of annual hospitalizations and weekly transportation time decreased (all P <0.001).
CONCLUSION: Although daily hemodialysis has received broad support from nephrologists, funding agencies, and lawmakers as the emerging standard of care for patients with end-stage renal disease, upcoming clinical trials would have to document substantial health benefits in order for patients to switch to daily hemodialysis, and many patients may still decline this regimen regardless of the documented benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15093757     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.12.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  10 in total

1.  Regulated payments for living kidney donation: an empirical assessment of the ethical concerns.

Authors:  Scott D Halpern; Amelie Raz; Rachel Kohn; Michael Rey; David A Asch; Peter Reese
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Consequences of frequent hemodialysis: comparison to conventional hemodialysis and transplantation.

Authors:  John B Stokes
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2011

3.  Numeracy and Understanding of Quantitative Aspects of Predictive Models: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Gary E Weissman; Kuldeep N Yadav; Vanessa Madden; Katherine R Courtright; Joanna L Hart; David A Asch; Marilyn M Schapira; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  Determinants of the decision to accept a kidney from a donor at increased risk for blood-borne viral infection.

Authors:  Peter P Reese; Tara Tehrani; Mary Ann Lim; David A Asch; Emily A Blumberg; Maureen K Simon; Roy D Bloom; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 5.  Hemodialysis in children with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Dominik Müller; Stuart L Goldstein
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 28.314

6.  Incremental and Personalized Hemodialysis Start: A New Standard of Care.

Authors:  Massimo Torreggiani; Antioco Fois; Antoine Chatrenet; Louise Nielsen; Lurlynis Gendrot; Elisa Longhitano; Léna Lecointre; Claudine Garcia; Conrad Breuer; Béatrice Mazé; Assia Hami; Guillaume Seret; Patrick Saulniers; Pierre Ronco; Frederic Lavainne; Giorgina Barbara Piccoli
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2022-02-19

Review 7.  Intensified hemodialysis regimens: neglected treatment options for children and adolescents.

Authors:  Dominik Müller; Miriam Zimmering; Christopher T Chan; Philip A McFarlane; Andreas Pierratos; Uwe Querfeld
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 8.  The advantages and challenges of increasing the duration and frequency of maintenance dialysis sessions.

Authors:  Charles Chazot; Guillaume Jean
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Nephrol       Date:  2008-11-25

Review 9.  Comparison of life participation activities among adults treated by hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and kidney transplantation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tanjala S Purnell; Priscilla Auguste; Deidra C Crews; Julio Lamprea-Montealegre; Temitope Olufade; Raquel Greer; Patti Ephraim; Johanna Sheu; Daniel Kostecki; Neil R Powe; Hamid Rabb; Bernard Jaar; L Ebony Boulware
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 8.860

10.  Patient and caregiver preferences for home dialysis-the home first study: a protocol for qualitative interviews and discrete choice experiments.

Authors:  Rachael C Walker; Rachael L Morton; Allison Tong; Mark R Marshall; Suetonia Palmer; Kirsten Howard
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.