Literature DB >> 15093382

Critical levels for ozone effects on vegetation in Europe.

J Fuhrer1, L Skärby, M R Ashmore.   

Abstract

The evidence of detrimental effects of ozone on vegetation in Europe, and the need to develop international control policies to reduce ozone exposures which are based on the effects of the pollutant, has led to attempts to define so-called critical levels of ozone above which adverse effects on trees, crops and natural vegetation may occur. This review is a critical assessment of the scientific basis of the concepts used to define critical levels for ozone and identifies the key limitations and uncertainties involved. The review focuses on the Level I critical level approach, which provides an environmental standard or threshold to minimise the effects of ozone on sensitive receptors, but does not seek to quantify the impacts of exceeding the critical level under field conditions. The concept of using the AOT (accumulated exposure over a threshold) to define long-term ozone exposure is demonstrated to be appropriate for several economically important species. The use of 40 ppb (giving the AOT40 index) as a threshold concentration gives a good linear fit to experimental data from open-top chambers for arable crops, but it is less certain that it provides the best fit to data for trees or semi-natural communities. Major uncertainties in defining critical level values relate to the choice of response parameter and species; the absence of data for many receptors, especially those of Mediterranean areas; and extrapolation to field conditions from relatively short-term open-top chamber experiments. The derivation of critical levels for long-lived organisms, such as forest trees, may require the use of modelling techniques based on physiological data from experimental studies. The exposure-response data which have been applied to derive critical levels should not be used to estimate the impacts of ozone over large areas, because of the uncertainties associated with extrapolation from the open-top chamber method, especially for forest trees, and because of spatial variation in atmospheric and environmental conditions, which may alter ozone uptake.

Year:  1997        PMID: 15093382     DOI: 10.1016/s0269-7491(97)00067-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  34 in total

1.  Air pollution impact assessment on agroecosystem and human health characterisation in the area surrounding the industrial settlement of Milazzo (Italy): a multidisciplinary approach.

Authors:  L Triolo; A Binazzi; P Cagnetti; P Carconi; A Correnti; E De Luca; R Di Bonito; G Grandoni; M Mastrantonio; S Rosa; M Schimberni; R Uccelli; G Zappa
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Is ozone flux inside leaves only a damage indicator? Clues from volatile isoprenoid studies.

Authors:  Francesco Loreto; Silvano Fares
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  An approach for evaluating the effectiveness of various ozone air quality standards for protecting trees.

Authors:  William E Hogsett; David T Tingey; E Henry Lee; Peter A Beedlow; Christian P Andersen
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Surface ozone measurements in the southwest of the Iberian Peninsula (Huelva, Spain).

Authors:  Jose A Adame Carnero; Juan P Bolívar; Benito A de la Morena
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Trends of air pollution in the Fichtelgebirge Mountains, Bavaria.

Authors:  O Klemm; H Lange
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Using leaf optical properties to detect ozone effects on foliar biochemistry.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Ainsworth; Shawn P Serbin; Jeffrey A Skoneczka; Philip A Townsend
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Screening of Bangladeshi winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars for sensitivity to ozone.

Authors:  Costas J Saitanis; Shafiqul M Bari; Kent O Burkey; Dimitris Stamatelopoulos; Evgenios Agathokleous
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Ozone exposure response for U.S. soybean cultivars: linear reductions in photosynthetic potential, biomass, and yield.

Authors:  Amy M Betzelberger; Craig R Yendrek; Jindong Sun; Courtney P Leisner; Randall L Nelson; Donald R Ort; Elizabeth A Ainsworth
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Influence of elevated CO2 and O3 on Betula pendula Roth crown structure.

Authors:  Olevi Kull; Ingmar Tulva; Elina Vapaavuori
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 10.  Tropospheric ozone pollution in India: effects on crop yield and product quality.

Authors:  Aditya Abha Singh; S B Agrawal
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.