Literature DB >> 15092196

Rodenticides in British barn owls.

I Newton1, I Wyllie, P Freestone.   

Abstract

Out of 145 Barn Owls found dead through accidents (66%), starvation (32%), shooting (2%) and poisoning (<1%), 10% contained residues of rodenticides, difenacoum or brodifacoum, in their livers. Difenacoum was in the range 0.005-0.106 microg g(-1) fresh weight, and brodifacoum was in the range 0.019-0.515 microg g(-1). Minimum levels of detection were about 0.005 microg g(-1) for both chemicals. Mice fed for 1 day on food containing difenacoum and brodifacoum died after 2-11 days. Within these mice residues were present at greater concentration in the liver than in the rest of the carcass. The mean mass of residue in a whole 35g mouse was estimated at 10.17 microg (range 4.73-20.65 microg) for difenacoum and 15.36 microg (range 8.07-26.55) for brodifacoum. Such poisoned mice were fed to Barn Owls for successive periods of 1, 3 and 6 days. All six owls fed on difenacoum-dosed mice survived all three treatments, in which up to an estimated 101.7 microg of difenacoum was consumed, and the coagulation times of their blood returned to near normal in less than 5-23 days. Four of the six owls fed on brodifacoum-dosed mice died 6-17 days after the 1-day treatment, but the survivors also survived the 3-day and 6-day treatments. Those that died had each eaten 3 mice, with a combined weight of about 105g and a total brodifacoum content of about 46.07 microg, which was equivalent to a dose of 0.150-0.182 mg kg(-1) of owl body weight. After death these owls had 0.63-1.25 micro g(-1) of brodifacoum in their livers. Blood from the survivors would not coagulate at 9 days post-treatment, but did so at 16 days in one bird and between 38 and 78 days in the other. It is concluded that: (1) Barn Owls in Britain are now widely exposed to second-generation rodenticides; (2) not all owls exposed to these chemicals are likely to receive a lethal dose; (3) brodifacoum is more toxic to owls than difenacoum; and (4) while there is yet no evidence that rodenticides have had any appreciable effect on Barn Owl populations in Britain, further monitoring of residue levels and population trends in desirable.

Entities:  

Year:  1990        PMID: 15092196     DOI: 10.1016/0269-7491(90)90015-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  10 in total

1.  Long-term impact of agricultural practices on the diversity of small mammal communities: a case study based on owl pellets.

Authors:  Alessandro Balestrieri; Andrea Gazzola; Giulio Formenton; Luca Canova
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Analysis of suspected wildlife crimes submitted for forensic examinations in Scotland.

Authors:  Caroline Millins; Fiona Howie; Charles Everitt; Michael Shand; Catherine Lamm
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 2.007

3.  Assessment of toxicity and coagulopathy of brodifacoum in Japanese quail and testing in wild owls.

Authors:  Kirstin H Webster; Kendal E Harr; Darin C Bennett; Tony D Williams; Kimberly M Cheng; France Maisonneuve; John E Elliott
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Use of two halogenated biphenyls as indicators of non-target exposure during rodenticide treatments.

Authors:  M G Townsend; P Entwisle; A D Hart
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.151

5.  Assessment of toxicity and potential risk of the anticoagulant rodenticide diphacinone using Eastern screech-owls (Megascops asio).

Authors:  Barnett A Rattner; Katherine E Horak; Rebecca S Lazarus; Karen M Eisenreich; Carol U Meteyer; Steven F Volker; Christopher M Campton; John D Eisemann; John J Johnston
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Assessment of risks of brodifacoum to non-target birds and mammals in New Zealand.

Authors:  Charles T Eason; Elaine C Murphy; Geoffrey R G Wright; Eric B Spurr
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Exposure pathways of anticoagulant rodenticides to nontarget wildlife.

Authors:  John E Elliott; Sofi Hindmarch; Courtney A Albert; Jason Emery; Pierre Mineau; France Maisonneuve
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 2.513

8.  Monitoring agricultural rodenticide use and secondary exposure of raptors in Scotland.

Authors:  J Hughes; E Sharp; M J Taylor; L Melton; G Hartley
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 2.823

9.  Causes of mortality and unintentional poisoning in predatory and scavenging birds in California.

Authors:  Terra R Kelly; Robert H Poppenga; Leslie A Woods; Yvette Z Hernandez; Walter M Boyce; Francisco J Samaniego; Steve G Torres; Christine K Johnson
Journal:  Vet Rec Open       Date:  2014-11-12

10.  Anticoagulant Rodenticide Contamination of Terrestrial Birds of Prey from Western Canada: Patterns and Trends, 1988-2018.

Authors:  John E Elliott; Veronica Silverthorn; Sofi Hindmarch; Sandi Lee; Victoria Bowes; Tony Redford; France Maisonneuve
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.218

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.