Literature DB >> 1509118

Hepatotoxicity and carcinogenicity in female Sprague-Dawley rats treated with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD): a pathology working group reevaluation.

D G Goodman1, R M Sauer.   

Abstract

Risk assessment for 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) has been based in part on the incidences of liver neoplasms in female Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats reported in a 2-year study conducted by Dow Chemical Corporation and published in 1978. In the years subsequent to the Dow report, the criteria for the diagnosis of proliferative hepatocellular lesions in the rat have been refined based upon ongoing study of these lesions. Because of this, PATHCO, Inc., was requested to conduct an independent review of the liver slides from the Dow TCDD study in order to assess how the current terminology might impact on interpretation of proliferative liver lesions in rats compared to the terminology used in the past. In March 1990, a pathology working group (PWG) was convened to review proliferative lesions in the livers of the female rats. The results of the PWG's evaluation of the microslides indicated a trend in tumor incidence similar to that published in 1978 but with a lower incidence of tumors in the middle and high dose females. Based on the morphologic findings, including the fact that the tumors were predominantly benign and usually associated with lesions of hepatic toxicity, the PWG considered this study to demonstrate a weak oncogenic effect of TCDD in the livers of female SD rats. As a result of its review, the PWG noted that in order to establish a relationship between the toxic hepatitis and the hepatocellular neoplasms, an independent review and grading of the toxic lesions in all female rats would be required.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1509118     DOI: 10.1016/0273-2300(92)90036-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) in 2-year bioassays in female Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Nigel J Walker; Michael E Wyde; Lawrence J Fischer; Abraham Nyska; John R Bucher
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.914

Review 2.  Dioxin risk assessment: mechanisms of action and possible toxicity in human health.

Authors:  Seyedeh Belin Tavakoly Sany; Rosli Hashim; Aishah Salleh; Majid Rezayi; David J Karlen; Bi Bi Marzieh Razavizadeh; Ebrahim Abouzari-Lotf
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  Dioxin: a review of its environmental effects and its aryl hydrocarbon receptor biology.

Authors:  Prabir K Mandal
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2005-04-08       Impact factor: 2.200

4.  Dioxin cancer risk--example of hormesis?

Authors:  Jouko Tuomisto; Juha Pekkanen; Hannu Kiviranta; Erkki Tukiainen; Terttu Vartiainen; Matti Viluksela; Jouni T Tuomisto
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 5.  Integrated ecological risk assessment of dioxin compounds.

Authors:  Seyedeh Belin Tavakoly Sany; Rosli Hashim; Majid Rezayi; Mohammad Azizur Rahman; Bi Bi Marzieh Razavizadeh; Ebrahim Abouzari-lotf; David J Karlen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-05-09       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  In utero exposure to 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-Dioxin affects the development of reproductive system in mouse.

Authors:  Mei Hua Jin; Hae Kyung Ko; Chang Hee Hong; Sang Won Han
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 2.759

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.