Literature DB >> 15090724

GSTM1 null genotype, red meat consumption and breast cancer risk (The Netherlands).

Olga L van der Hel1, Petra H M Peeters, David W Hein, Mark A Doll, Diederick E Grobbee, Marga Ocké, H Bas Bueno de Mesquita.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We studied whether polymorphisms in N-acetyltransferase 1 and 2 and Glutathione S-transferase M1 and T1 genes modify the association between meat consumption and breast cancer.
METHODS: A nested case control was conducted in a Dutch prospective cohort. Breast cancer cases (229) and controls (264) were frequency matched on age, town and menopausal status.
RESULTS: There is no relation between any type of meat consumption ( i.e., total meat, processed meat, fresh meat, red meat and white meat) and breast cancer risk. Neither presence of NAT1 or NAT2 rapid genotype, or GSTT1 null genotype, alone or in combination with meat consumption affects breast cancer risk. Absence of GSTM1 shows 46% increased breast cancer risk (OR = 1.46 (95% confidence interval, 95% CI = 1.02-2.09)). When stratifying according to combined 'GSTM1 genotype-meat consumption' categories, breast cancer risk is slightly increased with consumption of red meat both in women with genotype GSTM1 presence (OR = 1.49 and 1.75 for intermediate and high versus low consumption) and in GSTM1 null genotype (OR = 1.18 and 1.02). These increases are statistically not significant. In postmenopausal women a suggestion of an effect of red meat consumption is observed: effects are slightly stronger, although still not statistically significant and without a clear dose-response relation: OR = 1.79 (95% CI = 0.92-3.50) and 1.46 (1.46 (95% CI = 0.76-2.82) for intermediate and high compared to low red meat consumption respectively. Reliable evaluation of interaction is not possible due to the small number of cancers.
CONCLUSION: GSTM1 null genotype increases breast cancer risk. Red meat consumption slightly increases breast cancer risk, but the relation is not statistically significant and GSTM1, NAT1, NAT2 and GSTT1 polymorphisms do not modify this relation. Copyright 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15090724     DOI: 10.1023/B:CACO.0000024255.16305.f4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  10 in total

1.  Red meat, poultry, and fish intake and breast cancer risk among Hispanic and Non-Hispanic white women: The Breast Cancer Health Disparities Study.

Authors:  Andre E Kim; Abbie Lundgreen; Roger K Wolff; Laura Fejerman; Esther M John; Gabriela Torres-Mejía; Sue A Ingles; Stephanie D Boone; Avonne E Connor; Lisa M Hines; Kathy B Baumgartner; Anna Giuliano; Amit D Joshi; Martha L Slattery; Mariana C Stern
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Genetic polymorphisms of NFκB1-94ins/delATTG and NFκBIA-881A/G genes in Egyptian patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mohamed Ragab Youssef; Zeinab Ibraheim Attia; Rizk Ahmed El-Baz; Sameh Roshdy; Ahmad Settin
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Effect of rapid human N-acetyltransferase 2 haplotype on DNA damage and mutagenesis induced by 2-amino-3-methylimidazo-[4,5-f]quinoline (IQ) and 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo-[4,5-f]quinoxaline (MeIQx).

Authors:  Kristin J Metry; Jason R Neale; Mark A Doll; Ashley L Howarth; J Christopher States; W Glenn McGregor; William M Pierce; David W Hein
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Nutrients and nipple aspirate fluid composition: the breast microenvironment regulates protein expression and cancer aetiology.

Authors:  Ferdinando Mannello; Gaetana A Tonti; Franco Canestrari
Journal:  Genes Nutr       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 5.523

5.  Meat intake and meat preparation in relation to risk of postmenopausal breast cancer in the NIH-AARP diet and health study.

Authors:  Geoffrey C Kabat; Amanda J Cross; Yikyung Park; Arthur Schatzkin; Albert R Hollenbeck; Thomas E Rohan; Rashmi Sinha
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Role of human CYP1A1 and NAT2 in 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine-induced mutagenicity and DNA adducts.

Authors:  J Bendaly; K J Metry; M A Doll; G Jiang; J C States; N B Smith; J R Neale; J L Holloman; W M Pierce; D W Hein
Journal:  Xenobiotica       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.908

7.  Consumption of red and processed meat and breast cancer incidence: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.

Authors:  Maryam S Farvid; Mariana C Stern; Teresa Norat; Shizuka Sasazuki; Paolo Vineis; Matty P Weijenberg; Alicja Wolk; Kana Wu; Bernard W Stewart; Eunyoung Cho
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  The mediterranean dietary pattern and breast cancer risk in Greek-Cypriot women: a case-control study.

Authors:  Christiana A Demetriou; Andreas Hadjisavvas; Maria A Loizidou; Giorgos Loucaides; Ioanna Neophytou; Sabina Sieri; Eleni Kakouri; Nicos Middleton; Paolo Vineis; Kyriacos Kyriacou
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 9.  Dietary Protein Sources and Incidence of Breast Cancer: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies.

Authors:  Jing Wu; Rong Zeng; Junpeng Huang; Xufeng Li; Jiren Zhang; James Chung-Man Ho; Yanfang Zheng
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Intake of meat, meat mutagens, and iron and the risk of breast cancer in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  L M Ferrucci; A J Cross; B I Graubard; L A Brinton; C A McCarty; R G Ziegler; X Ma; S T Mayne; R Sinha
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.