BACKGROUND: Ultrafine particles have been hypothesised to be an important contributing factor in the toxicity and adverse health effects of particulate air pollution (PM10) and nanoparticles are used increasingly in industrial processes. AIMS: To compare the ability of ultrafine and fine particles of titanium dioxide and carbon black to induce inflammation, cause epithelial injury, and affect the alveolar macrophage clearance functions of phagocytosis and chemotaxis in vivo. METHODS: Rats were instilled with fine and ultrafine carbon black and titanium dioxide. Inflammation was quantified by bronchoalveolar lavage; the ability of the macrophages to phagoytose indictor fluorescent beads and to migrate towards aC5a were determined. RESULTS: Ultrafine particles induced more PMN recruitment, epithelial damage, and cytotoxicity than their fine counterparts, exposed at equal mass. Both ultrafine and fine particles significantly impaired the phagocytic ability of alveolar macrophages. Only ultrafine particle treatment significantly enhanced the sensitivity of alveolar macrophages to chemotact towards C5a. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrafine particles of two very different materials induced inflammation and epithelial damage to a greater extent than their fine counterparts. In general, the effect of ultrafine carbon black was greater than ultrafine titanium dioxide, suggesting that there are differences in the likely harmfulness of different types of ultrafine particle. Epithelial injury and toxicity were associated with the development of inflammation after exposure to ultrafines. Increased sensitivity to a C5a chemotactic gradient could make the ultrafine exposed macrophages more likely to be retained in the lungs, so allowing dose to accumulate.
BACKGROUND:Ultrafine particles have been hypothesised to be an important contributing factor in the toxicity and adverse health effects of particulate air pollution (PM10) and nanoparticles are used increasingly in industrial processes. AIMS: To compare the ability of ultrafine and fine particles of titanium dioxide and carbon black to induce inflammation, cause epithelial injury, and affect the alveolar macrophage clearance functions of phagocytosis and chemotaxis in vivo. METHODS:Rats were instilled with fine and ultrafine carbon black and titanium dioxide. Inflammation was quantified by bronchoalveolar lavage; the ability of the macrophages to phagoytose indictor fluorescent beads and to migrate towards aC5a were determined. RESULTS:Ultrafine particles induced more PMN recruitment, epithelial damage, and cytotoxicity than their fine counterparts, exposed at equal mass. Both ultrafine and fine particles significantly impaired the phagocytic ability of alveolar macrophages. Only ultrafine particle treatment significantly enhanced the sensitivity of alveolar macrophages to chemotact towards C5a. CONCLUSIONS:Ultrafine particles of two very different materials induced inflammation and epithelial damage to a greater extent than their fine counterparts. In general, the effect of ultrafine carbon black was greater than ultrafinetitanium dioxide, suggesting that there are differences in the likely harmfulness of different types of ultrafine particle. Epithelial injury and toxicity were associated with the development of inflammation after exposure to ultrafines. Increased sensitivity to a C5a chemotactic gradient could make the ultrafine exposed macrophages more likely to be retained in the lungs, so allowing dose to accumulate.
Authors: Martin R Wilson; Janet H Lightbody; Ken Donaldson; Jill Sales; Vicki Stone Journal: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol Date: 2002-11-01 Impact factor: 4.219
Authors: Ken Donaldson; David Brown; Anna Clouter; Rodger Duffin; William MacNee; Louise Renwick; Lang Tran; Vicki Stone Journal: J Aerosol Med Date: 2002
Authors: Maureen D Avakian; Barry Dellinger; Heidelore Fiedler; Brian Gullet; Catherine Koshland; Stellan Marklund; Günter Oberdörster; Stephen Safe; Adel Sarofim; Kirk R Smith; David Schwartz; William A Suk Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Jeffrey W Card; Darryl C Zeldin; James C Bonner; Earle R Nestmann Journal: Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol Date: 2008-07-18 Impact factor: 5.464
Authors: Anna C Reisetter; Larissa V Stebounova; Jonas Baltrusaitis; Linda Powers; Amit Gupta; Vicki H Grassian; Martha M Monick Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2011-04-27 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Naina Gour; Kuladeep Sudini; Syed Muaz Khalil; Ana M Rule; Peter Lees; Edward Gabrielson; John D Groopman; Stephane Lajoie; Anju Singh Journal: Environ Res Date: 2017-11-24 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Waheed Akram; Morgan Madhuku; Ishaq Ahmad; Li Xiaolin; Guilin Zhang; Li Yan Journal: Environ Monit Assess Date: 2014-09-26 Impact factor: 2.513
Authors: Søren T Larsen; Martin Roursgaard; Keld A Jensen; Gunnar D Nielsen Journal: Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol Date: 2009-10-28 Impact factor: 4.080
Authors: Helinor J Johnston; Gary R Hutchison; Frans M Christensen; Sheona Peters; Steve Hankin; Vicki Stone Journal: Part Fibre Toxicol Date: 2009-12-17 Impact factor: 9.400