Literature DB >> 15090409

Cost effectiveness of treatment for amblyopia: an analysis based on a probabilistic Markov model.

H-H König1, J-C Barry.   

Abstract

AIMS: To estimate the long term cost effectiveness of treatment for amblyopia in 3 year old children.
METHODS: A cost utility analysis was performed using decision analysis including a Markov state transition model. Incremental costs and effects during the children's remaining lifetime were estimated. The model took into account the costs and success rate of treatment as well as effects of unilateral and bilateral visual impairment caused by amblyopia and other eye diseases coming along later in life on quality of life (utility). Model parameter values were obtained from the literature, and from a survey of experts. For the utility of unilateral visual impairment a base value of 0.96 was assumed. Costs were estimated from a third party payer perspective for the year 2002 in Germany. Costs and effects were discounted at 3%. Uncertainty was assessed by univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (Monte-Carlo simulation).
RESULTS: The incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of treatment was euro2369 per quality adjusted life year (QALY). In univariate sensitivity analysis the ICER was most sensitive to uncertainty concerning the utility of unilateral visual impairment-for example, if this utility was 0.99, the ICER would be euro9148/QALY. Monte-Carlo simulation yielded a 95% uncertainty interval for the ICER of euro710/QALY to euro38 696/QALY; the probability of an ICER smaller than euro20 000/QALY was 95%.
CONCLUSION: Treatment for amblyopia is likely to be very cost effective. Much of the uncertainty in results comes from the uncertainty regarding the effect of amblyopia on quality of life. In order to reduce this uncertainty the impact of amblyopia on utility should be investigated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15090409      PMCID: PMC1772149          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2003.028712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  27 in total

1.  A comprehensive league table of cost-utility ratios and a sub-table of "panel-worthy" studies.

Authors:  R H Chapman; P W Stone; E A Sandberg; C Bell; P J Neumann
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2000 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 2.  Thinking outside the box: recent advances in the analysis and presentation of uncertainty in cost-effectiveness studies.

Authors:  Andrew H Briggs; Bernie J O'Brien; Gordon Blackhouse
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2001-10-25       Impact factor: 21.981

Review 3.  Handling uncertainty in cost-effectiveness models.

Authors:  A H Briggs
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  The therapy of amblyopia: an analysis comparing the results of amblyopia therapy utilizing two pooled data sets.

Authors:  J T Flynn; G Woodruff; J R Thompson; F Hiscox; W Feuer; J Schiffman; A Corona; L K Smith
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1999

5.  The therapy of amblyopia: an analysis of the results of amblyopia therapy utilizing the pooled data of published studies.

Authors:  J T Flynn; J Schiffman; W Feuer; A Corona
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1998

6.  Quality of life associated with unilateral and bilateral good vision.

Authors:  M M Brown; G C Brown; S Sharma; B Busbee; H Brown
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Converting visual acuity to utilities.

Authors:  S Sharma; G C Brown; M M Brown; G K Shah; K Snow; H Brown; H Hollands
Journal:  Can J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.882

8.  Long-term follow-up of occlusion therapy in amblyopia.

Authors:  H Leiba; M Shimshoni; M Oliver; N Gottesman; S Levartovsky
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  A randomized trial of atropine vs. patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children.

Authors: 
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-03

10.  Prediction of improved vision in the amblyopic eye after visual loss in the non-amblyopic eye.

Authors:  Jugnoo S Rahi; Stuart Logan; Mario Cortina Borja; Christine Timms; Isabelle Russell-Eggitt; David Taylor
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-08-24       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  15 in total

1.  Authors' qualifications and the BJO.

Authors:  D Papalkar; I C Francis
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  [Value-based medicine in ophthalmology].

Authors:  C Hirneiss; A S Neubauer; C Tribus; A Kampik
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  The negative impact of amblyopia from a population perspective: untreated amblyopia almost doubles the lifetime risk of bilateral visual impairment.

Authors:  Josefin Nilsso
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  The utility of strabismus in adults.

Authors:  George R Beauchamp; Joost Felius; David R Stager; Cynthia L Beauchamp
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2005

5.  The potential cost-effectiveness of amblyopia screening programs.

Authors:  David B Rein; John S Wittenborn; Xinzhi Zhang; Michael Song; Jinan B Saaddine
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 1.402

6.  Cost modeling of preoperative axillary ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration to guide surgery for invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Judy C Boughey; James P Moriarty; Amy C Degnim; Melissa S Gregg; Jason S Egginton; Kirsten Hall Long
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-02-02       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Cost-utility analysis of cataract surgery in Japan: a probabilistic Markov modeling study.

Authors:  Yoshimune Hiratsuka; Masakazu Yamada; Yoko Akune; Akira Murakami; Annabelle A Okada; Hidetoshi Yamashita; Yuichi Ohashi; Naoya Yamagishi; Hiroshi Tamura; Shunichi Fukuhara; Tomoyuki Takura
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 2.447

8.  Current concepts in the management of amblyopia.

Authors:  Blanca Ruiz de Zárate; Jaime Tejedor
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-12

Review 9.  The value of vision.

Authors:  Christine Knauer; Norbert Pfeiffer
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 10.  Childhood amblyopia: current management and new trends.

Authors:  Vijay Tailor; Manuela Bossi; John A Greenwood; Annegret Dahlmann-Noor
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 4.291

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.