Literature DB >> 15089893

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration is superior to lymph node echofeatures: a prospective evaluation of mediastinal and peri-intestinal lymphadenopathy.

Victor K Chen1, Mohamad A Eloubeidi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: The additional diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) over lymph node (LN) echofeatures alone in evaluating lymphadenopathy is unknown. The objectives of this study are (1) to prospectively evaluate the utility of EUS-FNA in evaluating mediastinal or peri-intestinal lymphadenopathy and to compare its yield to that of echofeatures alone and (2) to determine clinical and endosonographic features predictive of malignant involvement of LNs.
METHODS: All consecutive patients who underwent EUS-FNA of a LN over a 22-month period were prospectively evaluated. Reference standard for final diagnosis included: surgery (n = 76), long-term clinical and/or imaging follow-up (n = 74), or death from disease (n = 26).
RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-three EUS-FNAs of LNs were performed in 137 patients with no major complications. Locations of the biopsied LNs included 31% subcarinal, 21% celiac, 21% peripancreatic, 13% periesophageal, 4.4% aortopulmonary window, 3.2% perigastric, and 3.3% perirectal. Mean LN size was 20.5 mm (SD +/- 11.1) x 13.2 mm (SD +/- 7.97). The mean number of EUS-FNA passes was three (range 1-7). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of EUS-FNA of LNs were 98.3%, 100%, 100%, and 98.4%, respectively. EUS-FNA was more accurate compared to LN echofeatures alone (99.4%vs 75.4%, p < 0.001). Mediastinal LNs were 2.77 times less likely to be malignant as compared to other LN locations. In multivariable analysis, the number of LN echofeatures, site of LN, and patient's age were associated with malignant involvement (p= 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNA is superior to LN echofeatures in evaluating lymphadenopathy. Endosonographic LN features alone are particularly unreliable in the mediastinum, necessitating tissue confirmation. EUS-FNA can safely, reliably, and accurately sample mediastinal and peri-intestinal LNs obviating the need for more invasive testing or surgical intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15089893     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.04064.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  38 in total

1.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided elastography in the nodal staging of oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  Stuart Paterson; Fraser Duthie; Adrian J Stanley
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Interventional endoscopic ultrasound: Therapeutic capability and potential.

Authors:  Ilaria Tarantino; Luca Barresi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2009-10-15

3.  Contrast enhanced endoscopic ultrasound: More than just a fancy Doppler.

Authors:  Rachid M Mohamed; Brian M Yan
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-07-16

Review 4.  Ultrasound techniques in the evaluation of the mediastinum, part 2: mediastinal lymph node anatomy and diagnostic reach of ultrasound techniques, clinical work up of neoplastic and inflammatory mediastinal lymphadenopathy using ultrasound techniques and how to learn mediastinal endosonography.

Authors:  Christian Jenssen; Jouke Tabe Annema; Paul Clementsen; Xin-Wu Cui; Mathias Maximilian Borst; Christoph Frank Dietrich
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Celiac and perigastric lymph node metastasis of prostate cancer diagnosed with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration.

Authors:  T Attila; R Ricketts-Loriaux; D A Sauer; D O Faigel
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.522

6.  Larger short-axis length of lymph nodes: another predictor for malignant involvement.

Authors:  Mitsunobu Matsushita; Kazushige Uchida; Akiyoshi Nishio; Kazuichi Okazaki
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 7.  Is endoscopic ultrasonography still the modality of choice in preoperative staging of gastric cancer?

Authors:  Sung Wook Hwang; Dong Ho Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Imaging of pancreatic cancer: An overview.

Authors:  Pavan Tummala; Omer Junaidi; Banke Agarwal
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2011-09

9.  Endoscopic Ultrasonography-guided Fine Needle Aspiration for Computed Tomography-negative and Positron Emission Tomography-positive Mediastinal Lymph Node in a Patient with Recurrent Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Hansoo Kim; Su Jin Chung; Sang Gyun Kim; Joo Sung Kim; Hyun Chae Jung; In Sung Song
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 4.519

Review 10.  Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for the preoperative locoregional staging of primary gastric cancer.

Authors:  Simone Mocellin; Sandro Pasquali
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.