Literature DB >> 15088878

Radiographic parameters for prognosis of periodontal healing of infrabony defects: two different definitions of defect depth.

Peter Eickholz1, Torten Hörr, Filip Klein, Stefan Hassfeld, Ti-Sun Kim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate defect width and two different definitions of defect depth as prognostic factors of periodontal healing in infrabony defects treated by regenerative therapy 6 and 24 months after surgery.
METHODS: In 32 patients with moderate to advanced periodontitis, 50 infrabony defects were treated by the guided tissue regeneration (GTR) technique using non-resorbable or bioabsorbable barriers. Clinical parameters were assessed, and 50 triplets of standardized radiographs were taken before surgery and 6 and 24 months after surgery. Using a computer-assisted analysis, the distances cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) to alveolar crest (AC), CEJ to bony defect (BD), horizontal projection of the most coronal extension of the bony wall to the root surface to BD, width, and angle of the bony defects were measured. Depth of the bony defect was 1) calculated as CEJ-BD minus CEJ-AC (INFRA1) and 2) measured as horizontal projection of the most coronal extension of the bony wall to the root surface to BD (INFRA2).
RESULTS: Whereas statistically significant vertical clinical attachment level gains (CAL-V: 3.36 +/- 1.59 mm/ 3.41 +/- 1.72 mm; P < 0.001) could be found both 6 and 24 months after surgery, bony fill (0.70 +/- 2.52 mm; P = 0.056/1.21 +/- 2.55 mm; P < 0.005) was significant 24 months post-surgically only. In a multilevel regression analysis, CAL-V gain was predicted by bioabsorbable membrane (P = 0.005), baseline probing depths (PD) (P < 0.001), and actual smoking (P < 0.05). Bony fill could be predicted by baseline depth of the infrabony component as determined by INFRA2 (P < 0.05), angulation of bony defect (P < 0.005), and gingival index at baseline (P < 0.001). In narrow (< 37 degrees) and deep (> or = 4 mm) infrabony defects, bony fill was more pronounced than in wide and shallow defects (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Improvement achieved by GTR in infrabony defects can be maintained up to 24 months after surgery. Narrow and deep infrabony defects respond radiographically and are to some extent clinically more favorable to GTR therapy than are wide and shallow defects. The infrabony component of bony defects, as determined by the distance from the most coronal extension of the lateral bony wall to BD (INFRA2), is a better predictor of bony fill than that determined by AC-BD (INFRA1).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15088878     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2004.75.3.399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  24 in total

1.  Radiographic outcomes following treatment of intrabony defect with guided tissue regeneration in aggressive periodontitis.

Authors:  Thanasak Rakmanee; Gareth S Griffiths; Gita Auplish; Ulpee Darbar; Aviva Petrie; Irwin Olsen; Nikolaos Donos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-10-10       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparison of clinical values between cone beam computed tomography and conventional intraoral radiography in periodontal and infrabony defect assessment.

Authors:  Supreda Suphanantachat; Keenna Tantikul; Suphot Tamsailom; Pasupen Kosalagood; Kanokwan Nisapakultorn; Kanoknadda Tavedhikul
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Influence of individual brightness and contrast adjustment on accuracy of radiographic measurements of infrabony defects.

Authors:  D Tihanyi; I Gera; P Eickholz
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Evaluation of simulated periodontal defects via various radiographic methods.

Authors:  Ayse Zeynep Zengin; Pinar Sumer; Peruze Celenk
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Evaluation of Cyclosporine A with β-TCP in the Treatment of Human Infra bony Defects - A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.

Authors:  Jyotsna Amalakara; Krishnajaneya Reddy; Haritha Avula; Ashank Mishra; Butchibabu Kalakonda; Ruchi Pandey
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-01-01

6.  Efficacy of periodontal minimally invasive surgery with and without regenerative materials for treatment of intrabony defect: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Bei Liu; Xiangying Ouyang; Jun Kang; Shuangying Zhou; Chao Suo; Lingqiao Xu; Jianru Liu; Wenyi Liu
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Long-term outcome following regenerative periodontal treatment of intrabony defects.

Authors:  Kanyawat Rattanasuwan; Krittawat Lertsukprasert; Supanee Rassameemasmaung; Chulaluk Komoltri
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 2.634

8.  Treatment of intrabony defects with modified perforated membranes in aggressive periodontitis: a 12-month randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Bartłomiej Górski; Stanisław Jalowski; Renata Górska; Maciej Zaremba
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Clinical and radiographic evaluation of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft with concentrated growth factor versus concentrated growth factor alone in the treatment of intrabony defects.

Authors:  Tithi Vaid; Santosh Kumar; Rupal Mehta; Sujay Shah; Surabhi Joshi; Susmita Bhakkand; Tanvi Hirani
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2021-04-29

10.  A comparative evaluation of freeze dried bone allograft and decalcified freeze dried bone allograft in the treatment of intrabony defects: A clinical and radiographic study.

Authors:  Rajat Gothi; Mansi Bansal; Mayur Kaushik; Braham Prakash Khattak; Nikhil Sood; Vishal Taneja
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.