Literature DB >> 15088643

Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila simulans: so similar yet so different.

Pierre Capy1, Patricia Gibert.   

Abstract

During the last two decades, the two cosmopolitan species Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans have been compared with regard to numerous characteristics, ranging from their geographic distribution and ecology to their DNA polymorphism. Various traits have been compared, including morphology, physiology, sexual behavior, allozymes and other proteins, chromosomal inversions, mitochondrial and nuclear DNA, transposable elements, wolbachia etc. Such comparisons reveal similarities and differences between the two species, depending on the trait considered. In most cases, the between-population variability of D. simulans is lower than that of D. melanogaster, but the two species exhibit similar levels of within-population variability. One of the main exceptions is the nucleotide polymorphism of several nuclear regions. Although several hypotheses have been proposed to explain these observations, the evolutionary dynamics of these two species are far from being understood. How have two species sharing a common ancestor in the recent past accumulated so many differences? A brief history of comparisons of the two species, from the first in 1919 by A.H. Sturtevant, and a summary of the hypotheses proposed to explain the similarities and the differences between these species are presented and discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15088643     DOI: 10.1023/b:gene.0000017626.41548.97

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  23 in total

1.  Molecular evidence to suggest the origin of a colonization: Drosophila subobscura in America.

Authors:  Pedro A Araúz; Francesc Peris-Bondia; Amparo Latorre; Luís Serra; Francesc Mestres
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 1.082

Review 2.  The historical discovery of the nine species in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup.

Authors:  Jean R David; Françoise Lemeunier; Leonidas Tsacas; Amir Yassin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  The Context of Chemical Communication Driving a Mutualism.

Authors:  Catrin S Günther; Matthew R Goddard; Richard D Newcomb; Claudia C Buser
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Ethanol preference in Drosophila melanogaster is driven by its caloric value.

Authors:  Jascha B Pohl; Brett A Baldwin; Boingoc L Dinh; Pinkey Rahman; Dustin Smerek; Francisco J Prado; Nyssa Sherazee; Nigel S Atkinson
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 5.  Genetics and genomics of alcohol responses in Drosophila.

Authors:  Annie Park; Alfredo Ghezzi; Thilini P Wijesekera; Nigel S Atkinson
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 5.250

6.  African Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans populations have similar levels of sequence variability, suggesting comparable effective population sizes.

Authors:  Viola Nolte; Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Contrasted polymorphism patterns in a large sample of populations from the evolutionary genetics model Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Baudry; Nicolas Derome; Michèle Huet; Michel Veuille
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Genomic Patterns of Geographic Differentiation in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Alisa Sedghifar; Perot Saelao; David J Begun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Parallel Evolution of Copy-Number Variation across Continents in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Daniel R Schrider; Matthew W Hahn; David J Begun
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 16.240

10.  Systems-level analysis and evolution of the phototransduction network in Drosophila.

Authors:  Christian R Landry; Cristian I Castillo-Davis; Atsushi Ogura; Jun S Liu; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.