Literature DB >> 15088271

Quality of adverse drug experience reports submitted by pharmacists and physicians to the FDA.

S R Ahmad1, J P Freiman, D J Graham, R C Nelson.   

Abstract

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s Spontaneous Adverse Experience Reporting System is a computerized database with over one million adverse drug experience (ADE) reports. In 1992, the FDA received over 100,000 ADE reports and pharmacists were major contributors to these reports. In 1993, the FDA launched MEDWatch, a new initiative to enhance direct reporting of adverse events by health professionals. thus far, majority of reports to MEDWatch are from pharmacists. Drug regulatory agencies of some countries do not accept reports submitted by pharmacists. We performed a study to assess the quality of information in ADE reports submitted directly to the FDA by pharmacists and physicians and compared that with manufacturer-channelled 15-day reports. We evaluated 589 ADE reports with serious outcomes associated with nine new molecular entities. Data were analysed using Epi Info. Our results showed no substantial difference in a subjective assessment of the quality of information in the reports submitted by pharmacists or physicians, irrespective of whether these reports were submitted directly or via manufacturers. This study suggests that reports from hospital pharmacists are valuable and of comparable quality. We believe that all health professionals contribute to the success of FDA's MEDWatch programme and thereby play an important part in protecting public health by promptly reporting serious adverse events.

Year:  1996        PMID: 15088271     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1557(199601)5:1<1::AID-PDS203>3.0.CO;2-T

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf        ISSN: 1053-8569            Impact factor:   2.890


  5 in total

1.  Influence of pharmacists' attitudes on adverse drug reaction reporting : a case-control study in Portugal.

Authors:  Maria T Herdeiro; Adolfo Figueiras; Jorge Polónia; J J Gestal-Otero
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.606

2.  Factors that influence under-reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions among community pharmacists in a Spanish region.

Authors:  Marta Irujo; Guadalupe Beitia; Maira Bes-Rastrollo; Adolfo Figueiras; Sonia Hernández-Díaz; Berta Lasheras
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Factors that affect adverse drug reaction reporting among hospital pharmacists in Western China.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Zhongliang Zhou; Shimin Yang; Bianling Feng; Jun Zhao; Hua Liu; Haiyan Huang; Yu Fang
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2015-04-02

4.  Detection of adverse drug reactions through the minimum basic data set.

Authors:  Antonio Salmerón-García; José Cabeza Barrera; Maria José Vergara Pavón; Eva Román Márquez; Sol Cortés de Miguel; Inmaculada Vallejo-Rodríguez; Susana Raya García; Emilia Casado Fernández
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2010-03-06

5.  A Comparative Safety Analysis of Medicines Based on the UK Pharmacovigilance and General Practice Prescribing Data in England.

Authors:  Kinan Mokbel; Rob Daniels; Michael N Weedon; Leigh Jackson
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.