Literature DB >> 15088103

Gender-related differences in ventricular myocyte repolarization in the guinea pig.

Andrew F James1, Lesley A Arberry, Jules C Hancox.   

Abstract

It is well established that gender-differences exist in cardiac electrophysiology and these are thought to contribute to the increased risk of women, compared to men, for the potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmia, torsades de pointes. Data from animal models with abbreviated estrus cycles suggest that androgens may play a protective role in males. However, the role of female sex hormones in gender-differences in cardiac electrophysiology is less clear. This report describes gender differences in ventricular electrophysiology, investigated using the guinea pig heart. Ionic currents and action potentials were compared between ventricular myocytes isolated from male guinea pig hearts and those from females on the day of estrus (day 0) and 4 days post-estrus (day 4). The density of inward rectifier K(+) current (I(K1)) at -120 mV was significantly greater in male myocytes than in female myocytes either at day 0 or day 4. The peak L-type Ca(2+) current (I(Ca)) at +10 mV was also significantly larger in male myocytes than in day 0 and day 4 female myocytes. Moreover, I(Ca) differed significantly between day 0 and day 4 female myocytes, strongly suggesting that I(Ca) density varies around the estrus cycle. Delayed rectifier (I(K)) tail currents were significantly different between male and female day 4 myocytes. Action potential duration (at 90% repolarization; APD(90)) was significantly shorter in male myocytes than in female myocytes at day 0, but not at day 4, broadly consistent with the combined differences in I(K) and I(Ca) between the three groups. Taken together, our data are consistent with the contribution of multiple factors, rather than a single hormone, to gender differences in ventricular repolarization. Since female guinea pigs possess a conventional estrus cycle, our data suggest that this species may be well suited to elucidating the modulatory influence of ovarian steroids on ventricular repolarization and arrhythmic risk. Our findings suggest that further work examining the basis to gender differences in ventricular repolarization in the guinea pig is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15088103     DOI: 10.1007/s00395-003-0451-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol        ISSN: 0300-8428            Impact factor:   17.165


  15 in total

1.  Arrhythmogenic effect of androgens on the rat heart.

Authors:  Mariana Argenziano; Gisela Tiscornia; Rosalia Moretta; Leonardo Casal; Constanza Potilinski; Carlos Amorena; Eduardo Garcia Gras
Journal:  J Physiol Sci       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 2.781

2.  Acute effects of sex steroid hormones on susceptibility to cardiac arrhythmias: a simulation study.

Authors:  Pei-Chi Yang; Junko Kurokawa; Tetsushi Furukawa; Colleen E Clancy
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 4.475

3.  Gender Difference in Idiopathic Right Ventricular Outflow Tract-Ventricular Tachycardia.

Authors:  Jo-Nan Liao; Yu-Feng Hu; Wei-Shiang Lin; Yenn-Jiang Lin; Shih-Lin Chang; Li-Wei Lo; Ta-Chuan Duan; Fa-Po Chung; Cheng-Hung Li; Tze-Fan Chao; Beny Hartono; Shih-Ann Chen
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.672

Review 4.  Sex differences in cardiac autonomic regulation and in repolarisation electrocardiography.

Authors:  Peter Smetana; Marek Malik
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.657

5.  Sex, age, and regional differences in L-type calcium current are important determinants of arrhythmia phenotype in rabbit hearts with drug-induced long QT type 2.

Authors:  Carl Sims; Steven Reisenweber; Prakash C Viswanathan; Bum-Rak Choi; William H Walker; Guy Salama
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 17.367

6.  Characteristics of intracellular Ca2+ cycling in intact rat heart: a comparison of sex differences.

Authors:  J Andrew Wasserstrom; Sunil Kapur; Sabrina Jones; Tania Faruque; Rohan Sharma; James E Kelly; Amanda Pappas; Wilson Ho; Alan H Kadish; Gary L Aistrup
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 7.  Long QT syndrome: beyond the causal mutation.

Authors:  Ahmad S Amin; Yigal M Pinto; Arthur A M Wilde
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 8.  Sex differences in the mechanisms underlying long QT syndrome.

Authors:  Guy Salama; Glenna C L Bett
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 9.  Selected sex related differences in pathophysiology of cardiovascular system.

Authors:  O Kittnar
Journal:  Physiol Res       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 1.881

Review 10.  Sex differences in mechanisms of cardiac excitation-contraction coupling.

Authors:  Randi J Parks; Susan E Howlett
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 3.657

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.