Literature DB >> 15088048

Stereopsis and long-term stability of alignment in esotropia.

Eileen E Birch1, David R Stager, Priscilla Berry, Joel Leffler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recent studies of infantile and accommodative esotropia (ET) have focused on stereoacuity as a final outcome measurement for judging the success or failure of treatment. The purpose of the present study was to extend this approach by evaluating whether the presence of stereopsis developing immediately after surgical alignment or optical correction plays a role in maintenance of long-term alignment.
METHODS: Random-dot stereoacuity was assessed within 3 months of initial surgical alignment in 70 children with infantile ET and within 3 months of initial optical correction in 66 children with accommodative ET. At > or = 5 years of age, adverse outcomes were assessed including loss of alignment, amblyopia, and nil stereopsis. Risk-factor analysis was used to evaluate whether early nil stereopsis increased the risk for subsequent adverse outcomes.
RESULTS: In the infantile ET cohort, early nil stereopsis was associated with a 3.6 times (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.4 to 4.1) greater risk of surgery for recurrent ET or consecutive exotropia and a 4.2 times (95% CI 3.3 to 4.4) greater risk for nil stereopsis at > or = 5 years of age. In the accommodative ET cohort, early nil stereopsis was associated with a 17.4 times (95% CI 3.3 to 32.2) greater risk of surgery for ET and a 32.2 times (95% CI 15.8 to 35.6) greater risk for nil stereopsis at > or = 5 years of age.
CONCLUSION: Treatment protocols designed to optimize stereoacuity outcomes promote long-term stability of alignment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15088048     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2003.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  24 in total

1.  Binocular iPad treatment for amblyopia in preschool children.

Authors:  Eileen E Birch; Simone L Li; Reed M Jost; Sarah E Morale; Angie De La Cruz; David Stager; Lori Dao; David R Stager
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.220

Review 2.  Why do only some hyperopes become strabismic?

Authors:  Erin Babinsky; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  An action video game for the treatment of amblyopia in children: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Christina Gambacorta; Mor Nahum; Indu Vedamurthy; Jessica Bayliss; Josh Jordan; Daphne Bavelier; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2018-05-12       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Stereo vision and strabismus.

Authors:  J C A Read
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Lateral rectus sag and recurrent esotropia in children.

Authors:  Robert A Clark; Andrew E Choy; Joseph L Demer
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 1.220

6.  Increasing muscle strength as a treatment for strabismus: sustained release of insulin-like growth factor-1 in rabbit extraocular muscle.

Authors:  Linda K McLoon; Brian C Anderson; Stephen P Christiansen
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.220

7.  Rethinking amblyopia 2020.

Authors:  Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Horizontal Lang two-pencil test as a screening test for stereopsis and binocularity.

Authors:  Monisha E Nongpiur; Pradeep Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 9.  Amblyopia and binocular vision.

Authors:  Eileen E Birch
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 21.198

Review 10.  Stereoacuity outcomes after treatment of infantile and accommodative esotropia.

Authors:  Eileen E Birch; Jingyun Wang
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.