Literature DB >> 15086181

Lymphadenectomy along the middle colic artery in laparoscopic resection of transverse colon.

Takao Ichihara1, Moriatsu Takada, Satoshi Fukumoto, Yoshikazu Kuroda.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Although laparoscopic-assisted colectomy has been replacing open colectomy, dissection of lymph nodes along the main artery is sometimes difficult and dangerous in laparoscopic-assisted colectomy, especially, lymph nodes at the origin of the middle colic artery in laparoscopic resection of the transverse colon.
METHODOLOGY: After the isolation of colon, meso-colon in both ends was excised. Then, the colon was rotated clockwise 90 degrees by centering at the base of the meso-colon. This procedure made it easier to isolate the anterior and posterior leaf of the meso-colon at its base. The middle colic artery was divided at the root with the dissection of lymph nodes around the base of the meso-colon.
RESULTS: Successful lymphadenectomy of the lymph node along the origin of the middle colic artery was performed. Twelve patients with early transverse colon cancer underwent laparoscopic transverse colon resection using this method.
CONCLUSIONS: This method may contribute to the easy and safe laparoscopic transverse colectomy by improving the limited view of the laparoscope and raises the possibility for laparoscopic resection of advanced colon cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15086181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology        ISSN: 0172-6390


  9 in total

Review 1.  What is a meant when a laparoscopic surgical procedure is described as "safe"?

Authors:  D Weizman; J Cyriac; D R Urbach
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  A comparative study on the short-term clinicopathologic outcomes of laparoscopic surgery versus conventional open surgery for transverse colon cancer.

Authors:  H J Kim; I K Lee; Y S Lee; W K Kang; J K Park; S T Oh; J G Kim; Y H Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Laparoscopic Versus Open Transverse Colectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Paschalis Gavriilidis; Konstantinos Katsanos
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Outcome of Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Transverse Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Wei-Gen Zeng; Meng-Jia Liu; Zhi-Xiang Zhou; Hui-Rong Hou; Jian-Wei Liang; Zheng Wang; Xing-Mao Zhang; Jun-Jie Hu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the role of laparoscopic surgical resection of transverse colon tumours.

Authors:  M Chand; M R S Siddiqui; S Rasheed; G Brown; P Tekkis; A Parvaiz; T Qureshi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C B Sample; M Watson; A Okrainec; R Gupta; D Birch; M Anvari
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 3.453

Review 7.  What is the best surgical procedure of transverse colon cancer? An evidence map and minireview.

Authors:  Chen Li; Quan Wang; Ke-Wei Jiang
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-05-15

8.  Surgical and pathological outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for transverse colon cancer.

Authors:  Y S Lee; I K Lee; W K Kang; H M Cho; J K Park; S T Oh; J G Kim; Y H Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Initial experience of robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy for transverse colon cancer: a matched case-control study.

Authors:  Nicola de'Angelis; Salah Alghamdi; Andrea Renda; Daniel Azoulay; Francesco Brunetti
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 2.754

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.