Literature DB >> 15084764

The effect of circumcision status on periurethral and glanular bacterial flora.

Cüneyt Günşar1, Semra Kurutepe, Oğuz Alparslan, Omer Yilmaz, Zafer Dağlar, Aydin Sencan, Abdülkadir Genç, Can Taneli, Erol Mir.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Circumcision is a historical operation which is still performed for different purposes. The aim of this study is to investigate the changes in periurethral and glanular sulcus flora due to circumcision to determine the role of circumcision on urinary tract infections (UTIs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients who were circumcised for social-religious reasons between January 2000 and January 2001 were evaluated in this prospective study. Two swabs were taken from the periurethral and glanular sulcus regions both just before circumcision and 4 weeks after, and the bacteria cultured were recorded.
RESULTS: We isolated pathogenic bacteria in the periurethral region of 32 (64%) patients (enterococci in 14 cases; Escherichia coli in 12 cases) before circumcision, and this number decreased to 5 (10%) after circumcision. Similarly, pathogenic bacteria were cultured from the glanular sulcus swabs of 33 (68%) patients (enterococci in 14 cases; E. coli in 10 cases), as well as coagulase-negative staphylococci in another 15 patients before circumcision. Following circumcision, we detected pathogenic bacteria in the glanular cultures of only 4 cases, whereas 40 children had non-pathogenic skin flora. Only 1 of 5 children with history of UTIs (n = 1) and retractable phimosis (n = 4) had periurethral pathogenic bacteria (Proteus spp.) in the post-circumcision period. The differences between pre- and post-circumcision values of the pathogenic bacterial colonizations were statistically significant in both groups sampled (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Non-circumcised patients have similar pathogenic bacterial colonizations in the periurethral and the inner preputial regions, although they have no phimosis. The origin of periurethral flora should be the deeper preputial regions. The flora greatly changed with skin commensals after circumcision. Circumcision might be beneficial from this point of view. Copyright 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15084764     DOI: 10.1159/000077117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  6 in total

1.  Visibility of the urethral meatus and risk of urinary tract infections in uncircumcised boys.

Authors:  Alexander Sasha Dubrovsky; Bethany J Foster; Roman Jednak; Elise Mok; David McGillivray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Barriers of Mucosal Entry of HIV/SIV.

Authors:  Ann M Carias; Thomas J Hope
Journal:  Curr Immunol Rev       Date:  2019

Review 3.  HIV infection and immune defense of the penis.

Authors:  Deborah Anderson; Joseph A Politch; Jeffrey Pudney
Journal:  Am J Reprod Immunol       Date:  2011-01-09       Impact factor: 3.886

4.  Increased Likelihood of Bacterial Pathogens in the Coronal Sulcus and Urethra of Uncircumcised Men in a Diverse Group of HIV Infected and Uninfected Patients in India.

Authors:  John A Schneider; Sreenivasan Vadivelu; Chuanhong Liao; Shivani R Kandukuri; Bhavesh V Trikamji; Eugene Chang; Dionysis Antonopoulos; Sv Prasad; Vemu Lakshmi
Journal:  J Glob Infect Dis       Date:  2012-01

5.  Effect of preputial type on bacterial colonization and wound healing in boys undergoing circumcision.

Authors:  Hüseyin Tarhan; Ilker Akarken; Osman Koca; Işık Ozgü; Ferruh Zorlu
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2012-06-19

6.  State of the globe: the relationship between male circumcision and genitourinary infections.

Authors:  Nasr Ahmed
Journal:  J Glob Infect Dis       Date:  2012-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.