Literature DB >> 15084424

Accumbens dopamine and the regulation of effort in food-seeking behavior: modulation of work output by different ratio or force requirements.

Keita Ishiwari1, Suzanne M Weber, Susana Mingote, Mercè Correa, John D Salamone.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that depletions of accumbens dopamine (DA) make rats more sensitive to work-related response costs. One way of controlling work costs in operant tasks has been to use fixed-ratio (FR) schedules with different ratio requirements. In addition to using ratio requirements to control response costs, investigators also can employ different force requirements. In the present study, different groups of rats were trained on two schedules (FR 1 and FR 5) and weights were placed on the levers 2 days each week. In the FR 5 studies, two different weights were used (32 or 64 g), while three different weights were used in the FR 1 studies (32, 64, or 96 g). After baseline training, rats received intra-accumbens injections of either 6-OHDA to deplete DA, or ascorbate vehicle as the control. The effects of DA depletions were highly schedule-dependent. DA-depleted animals on the FR 5 schedule showed reductions in responding across the different weight conditions. In contrast, DA depletion did not significantly suppress FR 1 responding under any conditions. Addition of weights to the levers reduced responding on the FR 1 and FR 5 schedules, but did not enhance sensitivity to DA depletion. Thus, rats with accumbens DA depletions were sensitive to different ratio requirements, yet they were relatively insensitive to different force requirements within the range tested. These studies indicate that DA depletions make animals sensitive to temporal or rate components of work that greatly influence responding on ratio schedules. Copyright 2003 Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15084424     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2003.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  55 in total

1.  Representations of appetitive and aversive information in the primate orbitofrontal cortex.

Authors:  Sara E Morrison; C Daniel Salzman
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 2.  The behavioral pharmacology of effort-related choice behavior: dopamine, adenosine and beyond.

Authors:  John D Salamone; Merce Correa; Eric J Nunes; Patrick A Randall; Marta Pardo
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  Effort-related functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine and associated forebrain circuits.

Authors:  J D Salamone; M Correa; A Farrar; S M Mingote
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Mental fatigue disturbs local processing more than global processing.

Authors:  Dimitri van der Linden; Paul Eling
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-06-21

5.  The novel cannabinoid CB1 receptor neutral antagonist AM4113 suppresses food intake and food-reinforced behavior but does not induce signs of nausea in rats.

Authors:  Kelly S Sink; Peter J McLaughlin; Jodi Anne T Wood; Cara Brown; Pusheng Fan; V Kiran Vemuri; Yan Peng; Yan Pang; Teresa Olszewska; Teresa Olzewska; Ganesh A Thakur; Alex Makriyannis; Linda A Parker; John D Salamone
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 6.  Cannabinoid CB1 receptor inverse agonists and neutral antagonists: effects on food intake, food-reinforced behavior and food aversions.

Authors:  John D Salamone; Peter J McLaughlin; Kelly Sink; Alexandros Makriyannis; Linda A Parker
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-04-14

7.  Modeling operant behavior in the Parkinsonian rat.

Authors:  Irene Avila; Mark P Reilly; Federico Sanabria; Diana Posadas-Sánchez; Claudia L Chavez; Nikhil Banerjee; Peter Killeen; Eddie Castañeda
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  High on food: the interaction between the neural circuits for feeding and for reward.

Authors:  Jing-Jing Liu; Diptendu Mukherjee; Doron Haritan; Bogna Ignatowska-Jankowska; Ji Liu; Ami Citri; Zhiping P Pang
Journal:  Front Biol (Beijing)       Date:  2015-02-10

9.  Adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonism reverses the effects of dopamine receptor antagonism on instrumental output and effort-related choice in the rat: implications for studies of psychomotor slowing.

Authors:  Andrew M Farrar; Mariana Pereira; Francisco Velasco; Jörg Hockemeyer; Christa E Müller; John D Salamone
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Restricting dopaminergic signaling to either dorsolateral or medial striatum facilitates cognition.

Authors:  Martin Darvas; Richard D Palmiter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.