Literature DB >> 1508414

Cross species extrapolation in neurotoxicology: neurophysiological and neurobehavioral aspects.

G Winneke1.   

Abstract

The theory of phylogenetic continuity of animal species is the basis of any comparative or extrapolative endeavour (Calabrese, 1983). Cross species extrapolation is also a prerequisite for hazard identification in general and developmental neurotoxicology. Two steps must be distinguished: The first step is endpoint-based or qualitative, whereas the second is dose-based or quantitative. Comparison of different species, typically rodents, nonhuman primates and humans, in terms of endpoints is preferentially done within a framework of broad functional categories, such as sensory, motivational, cognitive, motor, and social variables. Within each category specific neurobehavioral as well as electrophysiological measures need to be considered; typically the degree of comparability is higher for electrophysiological than for most behavioral measures. For some frequently used behavioral endpoints in human neurotoxicology, such as psychometric IQ, there is no direct animal counterpart. Once the neural substrate of a particular neurotoxic effect has been identified, as is true for several chemicals such as the pyrethroid insecticides, the organophosphates, most nerve gases or MPTP, or if interspecies comparability in terms of endpoints has proven satisfactory, an effort towards quantitative, dose-based extrapolation is needed. Here species-specific differences in toxicokinetics and metabolism must be taken into consideration in order to arrive at valid translations of dose-response contingencies. If at all possible internal rather than external doses should serve as the frame of reference here. Neurotoxic chemicals of environmental concern for which an adequate data base is available for comparative purposes include alcohol, carbon monoxide, lead, methylmercury and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB). Principles of cross species extrapolation in neurotoxicology will be illustrated by means of representative neurobehavioral and electrophysiological findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1508414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurotoxicology        ISSN: 0161-813X            Impact factor:   4.294


  2 in total

Review 1.  Animal behavioral methods in neurotoxicity assessment: SGOMSEC joint report.

Authors:  B Kulig; E Alleva; G Bignami; J Cohn; D Cory-Slechta; V Landa; J O'Donoghue; D Peakall
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 2.  Comparable measures of cognitive function in human infants and laboratory animals to identify environmental health risks to children.

Authors:  Carolyn Sharbaugh; Susan Marie Viet; Alexa Fraser; Suzanne B McMaster
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 9.031

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.