Literature DB >> 15083660

Development of a theoretical construct for risk and vulnerability from six empirical studies.

Jeanne M Leffers1, Diane C Martins, Margaret M McGrath, Deborah Godfrey Brown, Judith Mercer, Mary C Sullivan, Paula Viau.   

Abstract

The concepts of risk and vulnerability are frequently the subject of nursing scholarship but lack semantic and conceptual clarity in the nursing literature. Using empirical evidence from 6 research studies, the authors define the concepts of risk and vulnerability, apply shared definitions to each of the study populations, and discuss 3 types of responses to risk observed in the research setting. This collaborative effort by nursing scholars advances conceptual clarity of risk and vulnerability for the development of nursing knowledge. Further, the examination of risk responses has the potential to link the various perspectives of risk and vulnerability common in nursing and generate nursing practice implications explored in this review.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15083660     DOI: 10.1891/rtnp.18.1.15.28060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Theory Nurs Pract        ISSN: 1541-6577            Impact factor:   0.688


  3 in total

Review 1.  Clinical research with economically disadvantaged populations.

Authors:  Colleen C Denny; Christine Grady
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Identifying the "vulnerables" in biomedical research: the vox populis from the Tuskegee Legacy Project.

Authors:  Christopher T Chiu; Ralph V Katz
Journal:  J Public Health Dent       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.821

3.  Vulnerable, but strong: The spinal cord-injured patient during rehabilitation.

Authors:  Sanne Angel
Journal:  Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being       Date:  2010-10-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.