OBJECTIVE: To examine the preinjury rates of Axis I disorders and the prospective rates within the first 6 years after traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Cross-sectional, longitudinal, and cross-sequential. SETTING: Community-based research and training center. PARTICIPANTS: Persons (N=188) who had sustained TBI within 4 years of enrollment into the project were interviewed at either 2 and 3 assessments. Each assessment was approximately 1 year apart. Several Axis I diagnoses were analyzed to detect cross-sectional differences (by age and time postinjury) and average individual changes over the multiple measurement time points. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. RESULTS: The odds ratios changed longitudinally within each subject, indicating a decreased probability of having an Axis I diagnosis over time. There were few cross-sectional differences in age; therefore, age at the time of injury had little impact on Axis I diagnoses. Cross-sectional time since injury was not associated with more psychiatric disorders, whereas cross-sectional preinjury history of psychiatric disorders was predictive of postinjury psychiatric disorders. After controlling for cross-sectional effects, the frequencies of Axis I disorders increased in depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorders in the first assessment postinjury and declined in subsequent assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-sequential analyses that control for cross-sectional and longitudinal differences produced a more complete description of psychiatric disorders after TBI.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the preinjury rates of Axis I disorders and the prospective rates within the first 6 years after traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Cross-sectional, longitudinal, and cross-sequential. SETTING: Community-based research and training center. PARTICIPANTS: Persons (N=188) who had sustained TBI within 4 years of enrollment into the project were interviewed at either 2 and 3 assessments. Each assessment was approximately 1 year apart. Several Axis I diagnoses were analyzed to detect cross-sectional differences (by age and time postinjury) and average individual changes over the multiple measurement time points. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. RESULTS: The odds ratios changed longitudinally within each subject, indicating a decreased probability of having an Axis I diagnosis over time. There were few cross-sectional differences in age; therefore, age at the time of injury had little impact on Axis I diagnoses. Cross-sectional time since injury was not associated with more psychiatric disorders, whereas cross-sectional preinjury history of psychiatric disorders was predictive of postinjury psychiatric disorders. After controlling for cross-sectional effects, the frequencies of Axis I disorders increased in depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorders in the first assessment postinjury and declined in subsequent assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Cross-sequential analyses that control for cross-sectional and longitudinal differences produced a more complete description of psychiatric disorders after TBI.
Authors: Dianxu Ren; Jun Fan; Ava M Puccio; David O Okonkwo; Sue R Beers; Yvette Conley Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2017 Nov/Dec Impact factor: 2.710
Authors: Evan Zahniser; Lindsay D Nelson; Sureyya S Dikmen; Joan E Machamer; Murray B Stein; Esther Yuh; Geoffrey T Manley; Nancy R Temkin Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Evan M Gordon; Randall S Scheibel; Laura Zambrano-Vazquez; Meilin Jia-Richards; Geoffrey J May; Eric C Meyer; Steven M Nelson Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2018-01-29 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Paul E Rapp; Brenna M Rosenberg; David O Keyser; Dominic Nathan; Kevin M Toruno; Christopher J Cellucci; Alfonso M Albano; Scott A Wylie; Douglas Gibson; Adele M K Gilpin; Theodore R Bashore Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2013-07-22 Impact factor: 4.003
Authors: Tessa Hart; Emma K T Benn; Emilia Bagiella; Patricia Arenth; Sureyya Dikmen; Dale C Hesdorffer; Thomas A Novack; Joseph H Ricker; Ross Zafonte Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2014-01-10 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Beeta Y Homaifar; Lisa A Brenner; Peter M Gutierrez; Jeri F Harwood; Caitlin Thompson; Christopher M Filley; James P Kelly; Lawrence E Adler Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Katherine C Lopez; Jacob B Leary; Dzung L Pham; Yi-Yu Chou; John Dsurney; Leighton Chan Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2016-06-10 Impact factor: 5.269