Literature DB >> 15083015

A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction.

Paul S Gill1, John P Hunt, Aldo B Guerra, Frank J Dellacroce, Scott K Sullivan, Jonathan Boraski, Stephen E Metzinger, Charles L Dupin, Robert J Allen.   

Abstract

This study examined 758 deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps for breast reconstruction, with respect to risk factors and associated complications. Risk factors that demonstrated significant association with any breast or abdominal complication included smoking (p = 0.0000), postreconstruction radiotherapy (p = 0.0000), and hypertension (p = 0.0370). Ninety-eight flaps (12.9 percent) developed fat necrosis. Associated risk factors were smoking (p = 0.0226) and postreconstruction radiotherapy (p = 0.0000). Interestingly, as the number of perforators increased, so did the incidence of fat necrosis. There were only 19 cases (2.5 percent) of partial flap loss and four cases (0.5 percent) of total flap loss. Patients with 45 flaps (5.9 percent) were returned to the operating room before the second-stage procedure. Patients with 29 flaps (3.8 percent) were returned to the operating room because of venous congestion. Venous congestion and any complication were observed to be statistically unrelated to the number of venous anastomoses. Overall, postoperative abdominal hernia or bulge occurred after only five reconstructions (0.7 percent). Complication rates in this large series were comparable to those in retrospective reviews of pedicle and free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flaps. Previous studies of the free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap described breast complication rates ranging from 8 to 13 percent and abdominal complication rates ranging from 0 to 82 percent. It was noted that, with experience in microsurgical techniques and perforator selection, the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap offers distinct advantages to patients, in terms of decreased donor-site morbidity and shorter recovery periods. Mastery of this flap provides reconstructive surgeons with more extensive options for the treatment of postmastectomy patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15083015     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000110328.47206.50

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  76 in total

Review 1.  Breast reconstruction following conservative mastectomies: predictors of complications and outcomes.

Authors:  Sophocles H Voineskos; Simon G Frank; Peter G Cordeiro
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

2.  Complications After Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction for Breast Cancer: A Claims-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Jing Jiang; Adeyiza O Momoh; Amy Alderman; Sharon H Giordano; Thomas A Buchholz; Lori J Pierce; Steven J Kronowitz; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Recent advances in microvascular autologous breast reconstruction after ablative tumor surgery.

Authors:  Michael S Pollhammer; Dominik Duscher; Manfred Schmidt; Georg M Huemer
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-10

Review 4.  Breast reconstruction.

Authors:  S Ahmed; A Snelling; M Bains; I H Whitworth
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-04-23

5.  A comparison of the superficial inferior epigastric artery flap and deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in postmastectomy reconstruction: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Achilleas Thoma; Leigh Jansen; Sheila Sprague; Eric Duku P Stat
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2008

6.  Advances and innovations in Breast Microsurgery.

Authors:  Rachel A Anolik; Justin M Sacks
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr

7.  Patient determinants as independent risk factors for postoperative complications of breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Andri Thorarinsson; Victoria Fröjd; Lars Kölby; Mattias Lidén; Anna Elander; Hans Mark
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-08

8.  A multiple logistic regression analysis of complications following microsurgical breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Samir Rao; Ellen C Stolle; Sarah Sher; Chun-Wang Lin; Bahram Momen; Maurice Y Nahabedian
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2014-11

9.  CASE REPORT Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction Salvage Following Late Venous Congestion After Discharge.

Authors:  Rodney K Chan; Jon A Mathy; Wojitec Przylecki; Lifei Guo; Stephanie A Caterson
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2010-10-13

10.  Postoperative Pain Management in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction: Identification of Patients With Poor Pain Control.

Authors:  Eran D Bar-Meir; Janet H Yueh; Philip E Hess; Christoph E A Hartmann; Munique Maia; Adam M Tobias; Bernard T Lee
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2010-09-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.