Robert M Wolfe1, Lisa K Sharp, Ralph M Wang. 1. Department of Family Medicine, Northwestern University, The Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois 60611-3078, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been promoted as a strategy to measure and improve the quality of patient care. However, more effort has been expended on creating guidelines than implementing them. We surveyed family physicians about their knowledge of and attitudes toward 3 well-publicized CPGs. METHODS: A survey questionnaire was sent to a national sample of 600 family physicians selected at random from a file from the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP). RESULTS: After 2 mailings, the response rate was 71%. For each of the 3 guidelines, roughly 60% of respondents were familiar or somewhat familiar with the CPG. More than half of family physicians studied said they have changed their medical practices based on CPGs, and only 3% said they do not believe in guidelines and would not use them. Use of CPGs was lowest among physicians in solo practice and among those working in rural areas. However, no significant differences in CPG use or familiarity were noted based on number of years in practice. Many respondents indicated an interest in keeping CPGs current via the internet. CONCLUSIONS: Most American family physicians find CPGs to be helpful, and familiarity with them is fairly uniform across most subgroups studied.
BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) have been promoted as a strategy to measure and improve the quality of patient care. However, more effort has been expended on creating guidelines than implementing them. We surveyed family physicians about their knowledge of and attitudes toward 3 well-publicized CPGs. METHODS: A survey questionnaire was sent to a national sample of 600 family physicians selected at random from a file from the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP). RESULTS: After 2 mailings, the response rate was 71%. For each of the 3 guidelines, roughly 60% of respondents were familiar or somewhat familiar with the CPG. More than half of family physicians studied said they have changed their medical practices based on CPGs, and only 3% said they do not believe in guidelines and would not use them. Use of CPGs was lowest among physicians in solo practice and among those working in rural areas. However, no significant differences in CPG use or familiarity were noted based on number of years in practice. Many respondents indicated an interest in keeping CPGs current via the internet. CONCLUSIONS: Most American family physicians find CPGs to be helpful, and familiarity with them is fairly uniform across most subgroups studied.
Authors: Paul K J Han; Carrie N Klabunde; Nancy Breen; Gigi Yuan; Alyssa Grauman; William W Davis; Stephen H Taplin Journal: Med Care Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Patrik Midlöv; Rickard Ekesbo; Lennart Johansson; Sofia Gerward; Kristin Persson; Christina Nerbrand; Bo Hedblad Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2008 Impact factor: 2.581
Authors: Nicholas J G Pimlott; Malini Persaud; Neil Drummond; Carole A Cohen; James L Silvius; Karen Seigel; Gary R Hollingworth; William B Dalziel Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 3.275