John K Petrella1, L Stephen Miller, M Elaine Cress. 1. Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Muscle Research Laboratory University of Alabama-Birmingham, VAMC/GRECC 11-G, 700 19th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA. jpetrella@physiology.uab.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: physical and cognitive function must be integrated and optimised in performance of daily activities. Age-related loss of physical function can result in poor performance of necessary daily activities and possibly lead to increased dependency and a change of living status. OBJECTIVES: (1) to evaluate average differences in physiological, cognitive, and functional performance of older adults from two different levels of independence, (2) to examine contributions of leg power, cognition, and functional performance to level of independence. DESIGN: cross-sectional study of self-reported 'independent' versus 'marginally dependent' older adults. SUBJECTS: 35 older adults (77.2 +/- 6 years) were placed into independent (n = 18) or marginally dependent (n = 17) groups based upon the Medical Outcomes Study SF36 physical function scores (independent: SF36PF > or = 85, marginally dependent: SF36PF < 85) and living status. METHODS: assessment of physical function includes the dependent variable, SF36PF. Assessment of physical, cognitive, and functional performance include the independent variables of leg extensor power, reaction time, processing speed, memory, attention, and functional performance. Functional performance is assessed by the Continuous Scale Physical Functional Performance Test. RESULTS: independent older adults have greater performance on leg power, reaction time, processing speed, memory, and functional performance than marginally dependent older adults. Functional performance is an independent predictor of level of independence. Leg power and cognition were separate small but significant predictors of independence. CONCLUSIONS: independent older adults have greater physiological, cognitive and functional performance than marginally dependent older adults. Individuals with greater functional performance tend to remain independent.
BACKGROUND: physical and cognitive function must be integrated and optimised in performance of daily activities. Age-related loss of physical function can result in poor performance of necessary daily activities and possibly lead to increased dependency and a change of living status. OBJECTIVES: (1) to evaluate average differences in physiological, cognitive, and functional performance of older adults from two different levels of independence, (2) to examine contributions of leg power, cognition, and functional performance to level of independence. DESIGN: cross-sectional study of self-reported 'independent' versus 'marginally dependent' older adults. SUBJECTS: 35 older adults (77.2 +/- 6 years) were placed into independent (n = 18) or marginally dependent (n = 17) groups based upon the Medical Outcomes Study SF36 physical function scores (independent: SF36PF > or = 85, marginally dependent: SF36PF < 85) and living status. METHODS: assessment of physical function includes the dependent variable, SF36PF. Assessment of physical, cognitive, and functional performance include the independent variables of leg extensor power, reaction time, processing speed, memory, attention, and functional performance. Functional performance is assessed by the Continuous Scale Physical Functional Performance Test. RESULTS: independent older adults have greater performance on leg power, reaction time, processing speed, memory, and functional performance than marginally dependent older adults. Functional performance is an independent predictor of level of independence. Leg power and cognition were separate small but significant predictors of independence. CONCLUSIONS: independent older adults have greater physiological, cognitive and functional performance than marginally dependent older adults. Individuals with greater functional performance tend to remain independent.
Authors: Sandor Balsamo; Jeffrey M Willardson; Santos de Santana Frederico; Jonato Prestes; Denise Coscrato Balsamo; da Cunha Nascimento Dahan; Leopoldo Dos Santos-Neto; Otávio T Nobrega Journal: Int J Gen Med Date: 2013-05-24