Literature DB >> 15082238

The use of the alkaline comet assay with lymphocytes in human biomonitoring studies.

Floriane Faust1, Fekadu Kassie, Siegfried Knasmüller, Rolf Hasso Boedecker, Marion Mann, Volker Mersch-Sundermann.   

Abstract

We reviewed the data of 45 alkaline comet assay studies with lymphocytes published during the last three years with the objective of monitoring human exposure to genotoxic agents as a result of occupation, drug treatment, diseases or environmental pollution. The strengths of the studies were that: (i) a lot of data could be obtained within a relatively short period of time in a cost-effective manner, (ii) lymphocytes could be easily collected in a non-invasive way and proved to be good surrogate cells in that they picked up effects caused by agents with different cancer target organs and (iii) a remarkable concordance between comet assay and cytogenetic assay data was proved. However, our analysis revealed some shortcomings of the studies such as: (i) the inclusion of low number of study participants and bias in the number and gender of subjects between control and exposed groups, (ii) lack of qualitative and quantitative exposure data, (iii) lack of consideration of differences in physical activity and diet between control and exposed groups, (iv) difficulty in comparison of the studies due to lack of uniformity in the comet assay procedures such as duration of alkali unwinding and electrophoresis, slide scoring method and the metrics used to assess the extent of DNA damage and (v) controversy in the sensitivity of comet assay since it picked up DNA damage caused by agents such as wood dust, pesticides and hormone preparations which were found to be weak genotoxins or non-genotoxins in other tests, but gave inconsistent results with known mutagens/carcinogens such as tobacco smoke. We feel that for the alkaline comet assay to be an important tool in human biomonitoring studies, serious consideration should be given to the flaws in the design and performance of the assay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15082238     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2003.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  29 in total

1.  Comet assay in neonatal sepsis.

Authors:  Natália C Carvalho; Rozilda L de Souza; Felipe Dal-Pizzol; Vanessa Moraes de Andrade
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  Outdoor air pollution and DNA damage.

Authors:  D M DeMarini; L D Claxton
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  In Vivo Autofluorescence Spectroscopic Study and Evaluation of DNA Damage By Comet Assay in Smokers.

Authors:  M Rajmohan; R Murali Naidu; D Thamaraiselvi; Deepasree M
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-05-01

4.  Toxicological responses of earthworm (Eisenia fetida) exposed to metal-contaminated soils.

Authors:  Kai Zheng; ZhengTao Liu; YaJie Li; YiBin Cui; Mei Li
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) acts as a tumor promoter on Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cells.

Authors:  N Jacquet; M A Maire; C Rast; M Bonnard; P Vasseur
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Assessment of genotoxic effects of lead in occupationally exposed workers.

Authors:  Srinivas Chinde; Monika Kumari; Kanapuram Rudrama Devi; Upadhyayula Suryanarayana Murty; Mohammed Fazlur Rahman; Srinivas Indu Kumari; Mohammed Mahboob; Paramjit Grover
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Vanadium as a chemoprotectant: effect of vanadium(III)-L-cysteine complex against cyclophosphamide-induced hepatotoxicity and genotoxicity in Swiss albino mice.

Authors:  Abhishek Basu; Arin Bhattacharjee; Somnath Singha Roy; Prosenjit Ghosh; Pramita Chakraborty; Ila Das; Sudin Bhattacharya
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.358

8.  Zinc supplementation reduced DNA breaks in Ethiopian women.

Authors:  Maya L Joray; Tian-Wei Yu; Emily Ho; Stephen L Clarke; Zeno Stanga; Tafere Gebreegziabher; K Michael Hambidge; Barbara J Stoecker
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  No effect of caloric restriction or exercise on radiation repair capacity.

Authors:  Nina Habermann; Karen W Makar; Clare Abbenhardt; Liren Xiao; Ching-Yun Wang; Heidi K Utsugi; Catherine M Alfano; Kristin L Campbell; Catherine Duggan; Karen E Foster-Schubert; Caitlin E Mason; Ikuyo Imayama; George L Blackburn; John D Potter; Anne McTiernan; Cornelia M Ulrich
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 10.  Relationship between head and neck cancer therapy and some genetic endpoints.

Authors:  Eliana Maria Minicucci; Glenda Nicioli da Silva; Daisy Maria Fávero Salvadori
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.