Literature DB >> 15082209

A prospective randomized trial comparing the 1-stage with the 2-stage implantation of a pulse generator in patients with pelvic floor dysfunction selected for sacral nerve stimulation.

K Everaert1, W Kerckhaert, H Caluwaerts, M Audenaert, H Vereecke, G De Cuypere, A Boelaert, U Van den Hombergh, W Oosterlinck.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate in a prospective, randomized setting if the 2-stage implant, compared to a 1-stage implant, leads to a superior subjective or objective outcome of sacral nerve stimulation after implantation of the pulse generator in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We implanted a sacral (S3) foramen lead and a pulse generator (model 3023, Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN, USA) in 42 patients. They were randomized in a 1-stage or a 2-stage implant if a more than 50% improvement in voided volume or reduction of residual urine was seen during the test stimulation phase as compared to baseline.
RESULTS: At 24 months follow-up, subjective (visual analogue scale) and objective (voided volume or residual urine) assessment were significantly better in the 2-stage group. Ten patients (24%) failed therapy, 7 in the 1-stage implant and 3 in the 2-stage group. Two patients were lost to follow-up. Logistic regression analysis revealed that failure was positively related to the 1-stage implant and negatively to the age of the patients. 76% of the treated patients had sustained clinical benefit with 23 revisions performed. The mean cost is respectively for the PNE (2006 Euro), for the 2-stage implant (10826 Euro) and for the 1 stage implant (8505 Euro).
CONCLUSION: With this study, we demonstrated that the 2-stage implantation technique of the sacral neuromodulation therapy performed as a longer test stimulation phase has a higher success rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15082209     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2003.11.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  21 in total

Review 1.  Selection of ideal candidates for neuromodulation in refractory overactive bladder.

Authors:  Ravi Kacker; Anurag K Das
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  New tined lead electrode in sacral neuromodulation: experience from a multicentre European study.

Authors:  Michele Spinelli; Ernest Weil; Edoardo Ostardo; Giulio Del Popolo; José L Ruiz-Cerdá; Gustav Kiss; John Heesakkers
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Role of sacral neuromodulation in modern urogynaecology practice: a review of recent literature.

Authors:  Samina Tahseen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  How does sacral modulation work best? Placement and programming techniques to maximize efficacy.

Authors:  Bastian Amend; Mahmoud Khalil; Thomas M Kessler; Karl-Dietrich Sievert
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Electrical neuromodulation in the management of lower urinary tract dysfunction: evidence, experience and future prospects.

Authors:  Alejandro Abello; Anurag K Das
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2018-02-22

6.  Surgical options for drug-refractory overactive bladder patients.

Authors:  Jonathan S Starkman; Christopher P Smith; David R Staskin
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2010

7.  [Sacral neuromodulation for refractory overactive bladder].

Authors:  Arndt van Ophoven
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  [Chronic pelvic pain syndrome: neurostimulation, neuromodulation and acupuncture].

Authors:  M Walter; U Sammer; T M Kessler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 9.  Contrasting the percutaneous nerve evaluation versus staged implantation in sacral neuromodulation.

Authors:  Chad Baxter; Ja-Hong Kim
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 10.  Sacral nerve stimulation to treat nonobstructive urinary retention in women.

Authors:  Craig V Comiter
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.