Literature DB >> 15082017

Footshock intensity and generalization in contextual and auditory-cued fear conditioning in the rat.

Elisabetta Baldi1, Carlo Ambrogi Lorenzini, Corrado Bucherelli.   

Abstract

The relationship between US (footshock) intensity and the two conditioned freezing responses (to acoustic CS and to "context") was investigated in fear conditioning. Administered footshock intensity was 0.00, 0.15, 0.30, 0.60, 0.90, and 1.20 mA to six different groups of 70-day-old male Albino Wistar rats. To measure contextual freezing, the animals were again placed inside the conditioning apparatus without acoustic CS and US presentation. To measure acoustic CS freezing, the animals were placed in a totally different apparatus and only the acoustic CS was presented. The 0.15 mA footshock intensity was not sufficient to condition the animals, in fact no freezing was exhibited as in the non-shocked control group. The 0.30 mA footshock intensity was sufficient only to condition the animals to the acoustic CS, whereas the 0.60 mA was sufficient to condition the animals both to acoustic CS and to context. Footshock intensities (0.90 and 1.20 mA) did not elicit any significant increase in conditioned freezing for either acoustic CS or context but at the highest one the generalization phenomenon appeared (freezing in the different context before presentation of acoustic CS). Acoustic CS freezing to all over-threshold intensities was longer than that to context. In conclusion, freezing responses to acoustic CS and context after increasing footshock intensities follow distinct patterns, and intermediate footshock intensities (0.60 and 0.90 mA) appear to be the most useful for eliciting conditioned freezing responses to acoustic CS and to context without inducing a generalized fear status contamination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15082017     DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2004.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  42 in total

1.  Olfactory fear conditioning induces field potential potentiation in rat olfactory cortex and amygdala.

Authors:  Yannick Sevelinges; Rémi Gervais; Belkacem Messaoudi; Lionel Granjon; Anne-Marie Mouly
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2004-11-10       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  The CB1 inverse agonist AM251, but not the CB1 antagonist AM4113, enhances retention of contextual fear conditioning in rats.

Authors:  K S Sink; K N Segovia; L E Collins; E J Markus; V K Vemuri; A Makriyannis; J D Salamone
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 3.533

3.  Neuronal encoding of the switch from specific to generalized fear.

Authors:  Supriya Ghosh; Sumantra Chattarji
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Modulation of fear generalization by the zona incerta.

Authors:  Archana Venkataraman; Natalia Brody; Preethi Reddi; Jidong Guo; Donald Gordon Rainnie; Brian George Dias
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  M3 muscarinic receptor in the ventral medial prefrontal cortex modulating the expression of contextual fear conditioning in rats.

Authors:  A G Fedoce; N C Ferreira-Junior; D G Reis; F M A Corrêa; L B M Resstel
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-10-31       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Ketamine Alleviates Fear Generalization Through GluN2B-BDNF Signaling in Mice.

Authors:  Muhammad Asim; Bo Hao; Yu-Han Yang; Bu-Fang Fan; Li Xue; Yan-Wei Shi; Xiao-Guang Wang; Hu Zhao
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 5.203

7.  A return to the psychiatric dark ages with a two-system framework for fear.

Authors:  Michael S Fanselow; Zachary T Pennington
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2017-11-10

8.  Pharmacological Rescue of Hippocampal Fear Learning Deficits in Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Luis A Martinez; Maria Victoria Tejada-Simon
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 5.590

9.  Cholinergic modulation during acquisition of olfactory fear conditioning alters learning and stimulus generalization in mice.

Authors:  Eloisa Pavesi; Allison Gooch; Elizabeth Lee; Max L Fletcher
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  Constitutive activation of the G-protein subunit Galphas within forebrain neurons causes PKA-dependent alterations in fear conditioning and cortical Arc mRNA expression.

Authors:  Michele P Kelly; York-Fong Cheung; Christopher Favilla; Steven J Siegel; Stephen J Kanes; Miles D Houslay; Ted Abel
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 2.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.